Candace Owens traces the Epstein-Mossad-Mega Group connection across the 1990s
Episode 3 of Candace Owens' Epstein Files series, a solo presentation examining the intelligence and financial networks surrounding Jeffrey Epstein.
Summary
Candace Owens opens Episode 3 of her Epstein Files series by introducing the "Mega" code name — an Israeli intelligence asset at the highest levels of the Clinton White House — and connecting it to the Mega Group, a secret club of Jewish billionaires co-founded by Les Wexner and Edgar Bronfman, whose stated goal was to achieve maximum impact on American policy toward Israel. She argues that Benjamin Netanyahu used recordings of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky to blackmail the president during peace negotiations, and that Monica Lewinsky's subsequent career — including her handbag line being picked up by Henri Bendel, an L Brands property — connects directly to Les Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein's financial empire. Owens also details Wexner's mysterious rise, his deep entanglement with Epstein, the suicide of Victoria's Secret founder Roy Raymond (who said meeting Wexner was "like meeting the devil"), and a journalist's warning that "Jeffrey Epstein equals toe tag." She closes by arguing that Trump's failure to meaningfully release Epstein files reflects either genuine fear for his life or his family's entanglement with Benjamin Netanyahu through Jared Kushner, and she praises Congressman Thomas Massie for continuing to push for transparency. The episode also includes a lengthy comments segment covering topics ranging from JD Vance to ADHD medication, and Owens debunks a viral tweet falsely claiming she owns dozens of properties worth tens of millions of dollars.
Key Takeaways
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Introduction: The "Toe Tag" Warning and the 1990s Context
Candace Owens: Jeffrey Epstein equals toe tag. That's apparently the message that a journalist received when he began investigating Jeffrey Epstein back in the '90s. I'm going to tell you all about that. And maybe that's the real reason why President Donald Trump is really scared. That's what a guy was informed, and we're starting to look around at the narrative and something is not adding up. So what we have to do is go backward. We absolutely have to jump back into the '90s to really understand the full Epstein story. So let's do that. Welcome back to the Epstein Files.
All right, you guys. I am very sorry that we dropped this series out of nowhere. I was kind of getting sued by the sitting president of France, so I got a little bit distracted. Anyway, where were we? Where are we right now as a society is maybe a better question.
We keep discussing this theme that I want to drill into your mind — this idea of the Midas touch. People who just have an invisible hand, a hand of wealth and power that pulls them through the ranks while the rest of us are working hard, really trying to get A's, get into school, make sure we get a good job, pay down our debts. Other people are just having resumes created for them. They can be really dumb, actually, and still be allowed to become, I don't know, like the president of France or whatever. They're effectively just trained actors and actresses. We know that Emanuel Macron was allegedly that individual. Jeffrey Epstein, we learned, was also this individual — Dalton School, pulled through the ranks, no background whatsoever in math or physics, but we're just told he was some sort of a savant. And of course, nobody can explain how he made billions of dollars, especially given the fact that he wasn't a genius and he certainly didn't have the credentials to be in the rooms that he was in. But yeah, someone pulled him through and up the ranks.
We've got to go back to the '90s. So let's go back to May specifically of 1997 in the United States. Where were you? Because a lot was going on in 1997 in the United States. I had just turned eight years old, and there was this really interesting thing that happened that you likely do not remember. It was more of a crisis, really.
The NSA Intercept and the "Mega" Code Name
Candace Owens: The NSA had intercepted a really mysterious communication between an agent at the Israeli embassy and the head of the Mossad, a man named Dan Yatom. They intercept this communication between the two of them, and the NSA — our security agency — begins freaking out. That's because the agent told Dan that the Israeli ambassador, a man named Eliahu Ben Elissar, was looking for a copy of a letter — a letter that the then-Secretary of State Warren Christopher had apparently delivered to Yasser Arafat. Now, Yasser Arafat was the president of Palestine, and Israel was looking to intercept that communication. What's the Secretary of State saying to Arafat? And this, by the way, was the day after Bibi Netanyahu and Arafat had signed what came to be known as the Hebron Accord.
So again, we have ourselves in the midst of this Israel-Palestine situation. They came to an agreement. What's got Israel so stressed? Why are you so stressed that you're now trying to get in the middle of a communication between the White House and the Palestinian leader at the time?
Now, according to the Washington Post, the exact language of that communication — translating from Hebrew — was: "The ambassador wants me to go to Mega to get a copy of that letter." The Mossad head, Dan Yatom, then replied: "That's not why we use Mega."
Instantly, panic — as you can imagine — because that's a code name. Mega. Who the heck is Mega? What are they talking about? There's a Mega that can intercept communications. Also, why are they trying to use Mega to intercept a communication between the White House and Yasser Arafat after a peace deal? Does that make any sense?
Oh, yeah. It actually does make some sense, because those peace deal negotiations included — come on — blackmail. Obviously. I think I told you this, but I'm going to quickly recap. The story goes that Israel and Palestine were negotiating — Israel, as they always do, had troops in Palestine, particularly in the West Bank, and they were negotiating pulling those troops out. Bill Clinton was hosting these negotiations in Maryland, and things were getting pretty heated. Clinton's like, "I'm the president of the United States. I've got power. Here's what's going to happen." And Bibi Netanyahu's like, "What do you mean? We own the world." It's just not looking good.
During these negotiations, Bibi Netanyahu takes Bill Clinton aside and asks him for the release of Jonathan Pollard — somebody who was also doing blackmail for Israel in the United States and was sentenced for getting caught assisting a foreign government. And what Bibi Netanyahu says to Bill Clinton when he pulls him aside is essentially: "Hey, don't worry, my friend. I just want to let you know that we have recordings between you and Monica Lewinsky, but we're going to throw them out." Wink.
Imagine — you're the president of the United States, you've got power, and your greatest ally takes you aside and says, "Hey, I just want to let you know we've got some recordings of you. They're a little frisky. You and an intern. But I'm your friend and we're going to throw them out." Yeah, that's what went down — at least if author Dan Halper is to be believed. And Bill Clinton, you can imagine, got the message. So it wasn't exactly a peaceful negotiation. It was more aptly described as a hostage situation. And Israel might have been feeling a little bit paranoid about what the White House was then sending in a letter to Palestinian representatives following that sit-down.
Remarkably, though, the FBI's investigation, the NSA's investigation to identify who this Mega was — a mole apparently at the highest levels of the White House, a mole that had access to President Bill Clinton and his immediate entourage, maybe even a member of his immediate entourage — suddenly, they weren't interested in finding out who he was. The entire investigation was quickly halted without any official explanation as to why.
Gordon Thomas, the Mega Group, and the Billionaire Network
Candace Owens: Two years later, author Gordon Thomas would explain the real reason why they stopped looking into Mega. He wrote a book called Gideon's Spies, and in that book he explains that the Israelis then further threatened the Clinton administration — threatened to release the tapes of the communications between President Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky if the hunt for code name Mega did not stop. And once again, that was all it took. No more was heard about code name Mega anymore.
Now, just a year after this NSA panic, in May of 1998, the Wall Street Journal published a very interesting article by journalist Lisa Miller, titled "Titans of Industry Join Forces to Work with Jewish Philanthropy." It revealed that there was a group coming together called the Mega Group — a private club of Jewish billionaires paying $30,000 annually toward this exclusive membership, meeting in secret twice a year. And their goal, as laid out in that article, was — quote — "to achieve maximum impact on American policy toward Israel."
In 2001, an Israeli journalist named Israel Shamir revealed more about that exclusive group. He had a newsletter, and he mentioned that within the Mega Group there was also indeed an individual who went by the code name Mega. This is what he wrote:
"The president of the World Jewish Congress invited the 50 richest and most influential American Jews to a meeting in Manhattan. There was no press coverage, no neon lights, just a few lines in the newspapers. They agreed to launch a public relations program under the Orwellian code name Emet — which is 'truth' in Hebrew — with the aim of influencing American public opinion regarding Israeli policy. These super-rich call themselves the Mega Group. This name emerged two years ago as that of an Israeli mole at the highest levels of the American establishment. The espionage specialists were wrong. Mega was not an agent. He was the boss. Much more than a cabal force, Mega is moving the needle in the Middle East. And it's not magic — it's money. Lots of money. They don't run the United States or Israel, but they wield powerful influence. Think about that: 50 multi-billionaires united in a single network represent a real force in the world."
Now, it becomes even more interesting when you learn that the Mega Group was founded by two men. One of those men was Edgar Bronfman. Those of you who have not watched the beginning of this Jeffrey Epstein series, please go back and watch Episode 1. To briefly recap: Edgar Bronfman's name keeps coming up. He was the guy that Epstein worked with on a mysterious bank transaction that got flagged by the SEC before the banking company went under. Bronfman was also the man who was president of the World Jewish Congress and was working with Robert Maxwell to negotiate the refusenik crisis — essentially trying to get the Russian government to allow Russian Jews to immigrate to Israel. At first the Russian government was refusing, and then suddenly said, "Okay, fine. You can go to Israel." Probably a lot of money made that happen.
The other co-founder of the Mega Group was Les Wexner. Yes, Les Wexner — key to Epstein's fortune.
Monica Lewinsky: Connections and Questions
Candace Owens: We know about Les Wexner, which brings me back to Monica Lewinsky. The Monica Lewinsky scandal — some details that maybe fell through the cracks. What do you even remember about that scandal? Me personally, there are moments that are just seared into your memory from the '90s. Definitively, the Monica Lewinsky scandal ranks pretty high — the OJ Simpson trial, the Monica Lewinsky scandal, back-to-back news, and you just had parents staring at a big screen TV wondering what was going to happen with Bill Clinton. The cigar involved. This is crazy, right?
And then at some point I remember her kind of being reintroduced and us being told that everything that happened to her was unfair. She also had to sit down and provide testimony during that time about what had happened to her.
She testified during the impeachment hearings, obviously. She's very presentable, well-spoken. There's a circus surrounding her, but she's composed. She is believable. She seems honest about what took place. And now, like I said, she's reemerged as something of a feminist icon. People look back and go, "Wow, this poor intern — everyone hated her because they loved Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton was a very loved president, left and right. He was the cool president." Then you have this intern, and maybe in the '90s we were too harsh on women. People are revisiting that and saying it's just really not fair.
I vaguely remember thinking she went overseas and kind of hid — her whole life was ruined by this scandal, which makes sense why she's kind of resurfacing. And she even has her own podcast now — Reclaiming with Monica Lewinsky. You feel that right now, watching this. You're like, "Oh, girl, yes — reclaim your name, Monica. They did you so dirty. That's not fair to you."
And to really show how much they put behind this reclaiming campaign, she recently sat down on the Call Her Daddy podcast. Here's a clip of Monica Lewinsky sitting down with Alex Cooper:
Monica Lewinsky: "Can you explain how the name-calling and the shaming slowly started to chip away at the way you felt about yourself?"
"I think — not everybody who has an affair feels this way, but I think a lot of people, especially young women who get involved in affairs — it already starts with a lack of self-esteem and self-worth. So I already had issues. It's kind of your worst nightmare: all the worst things that you think about yourself and say to yourself, you then start to have reflected and amplified by the whole world. And so — if it hadn't been for my family continuing to remind me of my true self, and then eventually when I was able to have my friends come in — I don't think I would have been able to make it through."
Candace Owens: Stunning, brave — all the right words there. Shaming someone, which we shouldn't do. And Monica Lewinsky very much sounds like a victim in the story. Gratefully, her family was there to get her through it. But who exactly is her family? Have we even thought about that? Is this a fair question to ask? I have questions. Monica Lewinsky, if you're watching this, I'd love to sit down with you, because now I have a lot of questions.
A little bit about her. Monica Lewinsky was born to a Lithuanian and German Jewish family. She comes across very believable, which makes sense because she was a theater kid. As we're learning in politics, a lot of these people were theater kids. She loved theater, loved her high school experience being involved in drama so much that after graduation she attended college but still opted to work in the drama department at Beverly Hills High School. And in 1992, she began an affair — not with President Clinton yet. She actually began her first affair with a married man. In 1992, she decided to begin an affair with her former high school drama instructor. She really liked the drama club, you know what I mean? And this affair was not short-lived — it went on for five years. So I'm thinking of the timeline here: that was definitely going on at the same time she was having an affair with Bill Clinton.
Interestingly enough, her mother was involved in a totally bonkers sexual scandal as well, pertaining to a book. Her mother uses a pen name and wrote a book about the Three Tenors. I'm not going to get too far into that, but suffice to say that when the Monica Lewinsky-Bill Clinton scandal broke, people began realizing that her mom had written this weird biographical book about the Tenors that contained hints of an affair similar to the affair her daughter was having with the president of the United States. It got weird and wacky, and the editor said they actually gutted portions of the book that were strangely and explicitly sexual.
What's interesting is the fact that despite Monica having a bachelor's degree in psychology and a background in theater, she kind of mysteriously gets this job interning — not just interning at the White House, but interning for the chief of staff for the president of the United States. The chief of staff's name was Leon Panetta, and he would go on to become the director of the CIA and later the Secretary of Defense. And I can assure you that you don't get those internships at that level unless you know somebody. I know this because I know people who have gotten those internships at that level. They're somebody's daughter, somebody's granddaughter, somebody who gave a ton of money to the campaign. That's who is packed that closely around presidents. You don't just write in and randomly get an internship working for the number three most powerful person in the United States. It doesn't work like that. It's all politics and nepotism.
And reflecting on her conversation with the Call Her Daddy host — I am not sure the narrative that she was a nobody victim thereafter thrown into obscurity is entirely truthful, because she then began designing handbags right after the affair happened. Again, despite no background in fashion, despite having a degree in psychology, she has an affair with the president of the United States and then just starts designing handbags. And I want to be clear: the bags are objectively not beautiful.
I'll tell you why that's important. Take a listen to this YouTuber who's going back and reviewing her line of purses:
YouTuber: "Monica quickly became kind of scorned and a pariah in society after that and actually had a lot of trouble just existing. Now she does some anti-bullying campaigns and stuff like that, but she lived kind of in solitude for a while. And one of the things she ended up doing when she was kind of outcast was starting to create her own line of handbags. Now I always thought these were kind of funny at the time because they seemed just like a cash grab to me — something that someone was doing at home looking for a side hustle. What do I have? What can I do? Oh, I can sew. I can buy fabric and sell some stuff online. So she created a line of bags called The Real Monica. And right here on the back of this one, it says 'Made especially for you by Monica.' I don't know how she knew she was going to make it for me, but she did. And that's the trademark."
Candace Owens: You see the bags. Not the most beautiful bags I've ever seen. And it wasn't a hobby, because despite those bags looking pretty tacky, they got picked up by arguably the most luxurious high-end retailer — Henri Bendel. I'm very familiar with that name because I worked in fashion for a bit in New York. That was a very, very high-end luxury department store. And they went to Monica and said, "These bags are amazing. We'll sell them for you." And then she gets into Nordstrom. How is that possible? How did Henri Bendel pick up these bags? It's giving kind of hand of Midas, if I'm being honest with you.
And who was the Midas that picked up these bags? Oh, I know who it was. It was Les Wexner. The guy who handed over his empire to Jeffrey Epstein — the Victoria's Secret guy — who then owned L Brands. And under L Brands, under his stewardship, they owned Henri Bendel. They were the ones who went to her and said, "We are going to pick up this bag and put it in high-end luxurious retail stores."
So to recap: Benjamin Netanyahu somehow got hold of sexual recordings — many sexual recordings — between Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton. He then uses those recordings to blackmail the president of the United States while negotiating. And then it turns out that the woman featured on those tapes gets a job designing bags, picked up by a luxury store controlled by a company that was being controlled, really, by Jeffrey Epstein — because it was being controlled by Jeffrey Epstein at that time. He had been handed the keys by Les Wexner, who happened to be in the business of blackmailing politicians. Who was Mega. Who had proximity to Bill Clinton.
Les Wexner: The Rise, the Connections, and the Deaths
Candace Owens: Now, a little bit more regarding Les Wexner. Like Jeffrey Epstein, his rise is also shrouded in mystery — financial mystery, a few untimely deaths. In fact, there was this journalist, Robert Friedman, who was investigating Wexner, and he explained: "When I reported on his connection with Jeffrey Epstein in the late 1990s, I received a letter from a certain Skyhawk who simply wrote: 'Jeffrey Epstein equals toe tag.'"
Yeah. Toe tag. Put it on your toe when you're dead. You will die if you investigate Jeffrey Epstein.
The Les Wexner story is one we've heard before, especially if you're in my book club and we start talking about the weird stories — they always establish a myth about themselves. On the East Coast, the myth is always that you get this businessman who says, "I just borrowed a couple of thousand bucks from my dad or my aunt and then I tripped and fell into a billion-dollar empire." And that really is the story of Les Wexner. He borrowed $5,000 from his aunt and tripped and fell into a fashion empire. I'm not kidding. He was born on September 8th, 1937, in Dayton, Ohio. This salesman, who was apparently running a small family clothing store, is said to have built the Limited brand — which then became L Brands — from just a tiny little store he opened in 1963 with just $5,000 borrowed from his aunt.
Les Wexner is obviously best known for Victoria's Secret lingerie. And Epstein, we learned, used that lingerie brand to lure teenage girls — falsely representing himself, even wanting to create this idea that they were somehow Victorian by falsely registering the company in London to match that Victorian-era marketing, after its 1982 acquisition from its founder Roy Raymond.
Now I should tell you something about Roy Raymond, the actual true founder of Victoria's Secret. He was found suicided — off the Golden Gate Bridge in 1993. And before he died, he said something interesting about Les Wexner. He said: "When I met him, it was like I met the devil." We will not be able to ask him why he felt that way, because then he died off the Golden Gate Bridge, and then Les Wexner — who he thought was the devil — took his company.
In 2008, another L Brands brand known as La Senza attracted a ton of attention because of its very odd advertising campaign, which featured the slogan: "Why should only adults have all the fun?" And what were they doing? They were promoting a line of lace thongs and bras for girls between the ages of five and twelve.
Another scandal that Les Wexner was involved in was when he was investigated by the US Department of Homeland Security under human trafficking laws for its supplier of organic and fair-trade cotton coming from Burkina Faso.
Now, to everyone's surprise, Les Wexner — known as a lifelong bachelor — suddenly decided to get married when he was 55 years old. He chose to marry a 35-year-old woman named Abigail Coppel. Abigail Coppel was the head of the North American office of the Israeli airline El Al, which was involved in a ton of Mossad operations from its very inception in 1949. And a source who worked with Abigail Coppel at Davis Polk and Wardwell said that they thought she was — quote — "completely asexual. There was nothing feminine about her. So we assumed Wexner was gay and was getting married just to appease his mother." A second source would claim that Abigail was a lesbian and that the couple just had a business relationship. That was reported, by the way, by Kirby Sommers in her book Jeffrey Epstein: Predator, Spy.
According to the Wall Street Journal, it was Jeffrey Epstein who in January of 1993 allegedly wrote the prenuptial agreement between Les Wexner and Abigail Coppel. So he was very, very involved with Les Wexner. How involved? Well, under oath, Jeffrey Epstein was asked rather mysteriously whether or not he had a sexual relationship with Les Wexner — whether or not he was bisexual. That's interesting.
The next part I'm going to read directly from Xavier Brossard's forthcoming book regarding the Epstein scandal. Xavier Brossard reports:
"Many in Manhattan and London speculated about a romantic affair between Jeffrey and Les when, in July of 1991, Les Wexner signed a power of attorney giving Epstein the authority to hire people, write checks, buy and sell properties, and borrow money in his name."
It's worth noting that Les Wexner's alleged homosexuality is essentially part of his defense today. He claims to have cut ties in 2007 and in a half-hearted way plays the part of being the abused lover of Jeffrey Epstein, who allegedly embezzled $46 million of his fortune over the years — at least according to a statement from the Wexner Foundation published in the summer of 2019.
And in addition to the lawsuits he faces for child sexual abuse that occurred at the Manhattan mansion under premises liability, Wexner's name also resurfaced in a sexual abuse scandal at Ohio State University, where Les Wexner was chairing the board of trustees as a major benefactor. A group of plaintiffs turned to federal agents to examine the nature of their relationship with Dr. Richard Strauss, a physician in the athletics department at the university who had abused at least 177 male student patients between 1978 and 1998.
So yeah, it's interesting to consider Les Wexner as a piece of this equation. It's kind of the only excuse they give us for why Jeffrey Epstein really had any money, why Wexner trusted Epstein so much that he handed over his keys.
The Untimely Deaths and the INSLAW Connection
Candace Owens: What we can say is there was a lot happening in 1997 and 1998. You have the Mega Group being launched. You have the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which broke in 1998. You have Jeffrey Epstein being handed the keys to the Wexner empire. And of course, in addition, there always has to be an untimely death.
There was an untimely death — a journalist named Danny Casolaro who happened to be investigating all of this. In fact, he said he was investigating — and I quote — "an inter-cabal that involved a computer software known as INSLAW and the Iran-Contra affair." But before he could figure out what he was talking about, before he could hit publish on that investigation, Danny died of an accidental drowning. Again, timely. We're going to never know what he was speaking about. But there is probably a lot more I could tell you about that computer software program, and I will tell you about that.
Trump, the Epstein Files, and Thomas Massie
Candace Owens: It's a good place for us to stop today regarding Jeffrey Epstein, because it is just shocking. It makes you go: are we being a little too harsh on President Trump by demanding the Epstein files? For those of us who aren't even certain whether or not Epstein is dead — and the more you learn about the Epstein scandal and what we know about Bibi Netanyahu and what he's doing, feeling nothing toward Palestinians — is Trump just terrified for his life? Did he have no idea what he was getting into when he decided he wanted to be the president of the United States? Did he have no idea? Was there no warning given to him by Bill Clinton? Like, hey, I'm not so sure you have any power, and you better be very careful as to what interns are being hired and what their connections are.
Did Donald Trump make the mistake that all of us made growing up — believing that we lived in a republic, a democracy, believing that we voted for politicians who had real power, having no idea that there was this invisible hand that just keeps getting caught in blackmail scandals and then looking us in the face and saying, "Nope, nothing to see here. Keep moving."
By the way, as we predicted, Trump made some noise and said, "Oh, we're going to demand Pam Bondi. We're going to demand that New York unseals the grand jury testimony." We told you that was obviously a nothing burger. The grand jury testimony in Ghislaine Maxwell's case — the federal judge has come out and said the same thing. He said, "Nope. This motion is absolute nonsense." The motion to unseal the grand jury testimony from the criminal case pertaining to Ghislaine Maxwell. He wrote a 31-page opinion, the presiding judge in this matter, and he was pretty harsh about Trump. He basically said that even asking for this is completely ridiculous, that the reasoning for it is demonstrably false, and that Trump knew this — he knew that the transcripts would not reveal any new information of any consequence about Epstein and Maxwell's crimes. He suggested that the Trump administration only pushed to release those documents as a form of diversion: "Oh, we're doing something" — but we're not doing something. And that's what we said. We told you guys that's exactly what was happening, that this entire premise was just to hope that we moved on from it.
Again, I'll ask the question: do you think that we are being too harsh in this matter, and that Trump is terrified? I can tell you what I think. I think he is terrified. I think he's terrified for his life. I really do. Partially terrified for his life, and partially his family is very involved — very involved — with Bibi Netanyahu. And I don't think Jared Kushner is the kind of guy who's going to stand up to Bibi Netanyahu. He's working with Israel and their technology, if that's what we're calling it. With allies like these, who needs enemies, right?
Anyways, Thomas Massie is still pushing. He's been very brave. He's tweeted that he is going to be hosting a press conference at the Capitol, joined by survivors of Epstein and Maxwell's abuse, several of whom are going to be speaking out for the very first time. He's saying that the survivors deserve justice and the Americans deserve transparency. And of course, he is correct. He's absolutely correct.
Reader Comments
Candace Owens: Lastly, before we get to some of your comments, I've got to tell you about this absolutely hilarious story. Speaking of foreign states that are trying to intimidate people — I have no idea what game the Macrons are playing in the press, but yesterday a tweet had gone semi-viral. It had almost a thousand retweets and it was being pushed by this totally deranged human being named Nathan Livingston. He's obsessed with me, trying to tether me to Andrew Tate. I have no idea why. But he did an exposé because we got an estimate — and truthfully, we were told that it was going to cost $5 million if this court case goes through with Emanuel Macron. We don't have that money. We simply do not have that kind of money. And so he did an exposé, which the Zionists were all passing around, saying that I lied to you guys and that they had discovered my secret wealth.
And I was very excited about this. I wanted this to be true so bad. Never in my life did I not want to debunk something about myself, because deep down I do want to randomly find out that I'm a secret wealthy princess. That never goes away. After you watch The Princess Diaries, it never dies inside of you. You just hope that you will be the princess of Geneva.
He presents this tweet — he actually went in and did a whole video, branded it with his investigation, and explained that it was always George — they always say it's George, my husband, who has this wealth. And this was the headline he was pulling from. He shared this breakdown of my alleged wealth. The homes that I own: a 7,200-square-foot Malibu estate worth $5.5 million; a Colorado farm that's 8,000 square feet worth $3.2 million; a Nashville home worth $8 million; an Austin mansion worth $7 million; a Stamford home worth $6 million; a Miami commercial property worth $2.7 million; and Nebraska farmland — 90 acres — worth $1.8 million. And that's not it, because I'm international. Also, a London mansion — 12 bedrooms, $19.5 million. By the way, if you know anything about London, that's a steal. And then he says I have ten additional properties in the UK, France, Morocco, Belgium — spelled wrong, because apparently it's in "Belgim" — and Germany.
He shared this dead seriously, and people were sharing it like it was an exposé. And nobody at any point did these people go, "That just means Candace has more properties than Jeffrey Epstein." I don't even know billionaires who have that many properties. That just sounds like too much to manage. Royals don't have this many properties. Nothing stopped him. Didn't think it was weird. Didn't think to check how that information came about.
And apparently he said he pulled it from this website which no one's ever heard of called This Trading Life, and it has a picture of my husband. They just make my husband richer every year. And I'm honestly prone to conspiracy, so I was like, "Is he lying? Do we have a random real estate empire? I thought we only have his one house. Why am I doing this podcast from my basement if we have all of this?" I was a little bit angry, a little bit excited about George Farmer's wealth, which I'm telling you goes up by $200 million every year. It's incredible.
He thought it was hilarious. He was sending it around to his friends. And then I obviously made fun of this. I was like, "Wow, I don't even know what kind of misinformation this is, but I really don't want to debunk this. Unfortunately, I only have one house. It's here and it's in Tennessee, and we don't have $5 million laying around to spend on a lawsuit." So I was telling the truth. Eventually he removes the video — but not without kind of insulting me. He made this whole video but said: "I removed the video I previously posted estimating Candace Owens and her husband's net worth and their real estate portfolio. New information has convinced me that the content was based on inaccurate data. I'm committed to accountability and ensuring that I don't spread false information — the opposite of what Candace Owens does. I'll make sure I do better, thoroughly verifying the information that's being put out."
Yeah. So he vetted it so hardcore that he pulled it from a parody account. It was a parody account that shared it and was just making up stuff for fun. This guy took it seriously, spent hours of his life editing a video. And I'm just over here wishing — not really, because it really does sound like a headache — but in a perfect scenario, one day I would love to have a house in the mountains. So if you're watching, hand of Midas people, Rothschilds, Les Wexner, whatever is going on — if you could just maybe give me a house in the mountains, then I'm good. I don't want too much more than that. I don't ask for much here.
Anyways, let's get into some of your comments.
Will Wallace writes: "Hottest channel on YouTube. Let's go. It's why I love Candace. While the haters hate, she comes with receipts, names, references, times, and places. They say you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. Wake up, people."
I totally agree with you that people have to wake up. We're giving you all the information. We actually aren't relying on a random trading website. We try to research as much as possible. We're not perfect, but we are making an attempt and we spend a lot of time researching every single day.
Miss Mary Mack writes: "JD Vance is the Woodrow Wilson of our time. Never Vance."
We actually covered JD Vance right when he became the vice president — when Trump announced that he wanted him to be VP. Mark was instantly like, "You've got to look into this guy. He's got an interesting background." I try to hold off on fully judging someone until I meet them. I raise suspicions about his background, but until you can sit down and ask questions, we probably shouldn't put together an entire picture. And I have said I would sit down with JD Vance in a heartbeat. He comes across very well. He is a fellow Catholic. But I definitely have some questions about how he got his Netflix deal and things of that nature. You can go back and find that episode.
Endless Love writes: "Hey Candace, since you talked about Sigmund Freud, would you consider looking into the history of ADHD too? Is it even real? Medication for kids is similar to cocaine according to some sources."
It's more like meth, actually. And yeah, getting kids on methamphetamines when they're really young — we should definitely probably explore that. All of these child diagnoses. Honestly, the craziest part is saying your child is not paying attention in school. It's not sitting still. When your five-year-old child is not sitting still, so he's got attention deficit hyperactivity disorder — is that a fancy word for "he's a five-year-old"? I don't understand. Do you know how much energy boys have? It is crazy. I used to nanny for a family, and the mother had her son — he was six years old — on Adderall because she said he wasn't sitting still at school. I was just like, "Wow. I think that's what six-year-old boys do. It's unnatural to have them sitting for hours in school." But what do I know? I'm not a doctor. I'm not an expert.
Someone writes: "Candace, you owe nothing to Nick fans who show up here every day and pretend to do something. I don't mind Nick, but he attracts the worst of the worst fan base. Nick could learn from you about what it means to have class."
Couldn't care less, honestly. What's amazing about them is that they're here every day. They're watching the show. Kanye said, "Love your fans. Love your haters. They're your biggest fans." And that is an absolute fact. It's so lame — just old-day "I just don't care." Especially after yesterday, the amount of lies that were told — offered the platform back to clear them up. This whole idea that I'm an op working for Russia. It's just so nutty and crazy and dishonorable for any person who has been welcomed into your home, who you were kind to, to do what he is doing. It's totally theatrical. And I obviously have nothing to hide. I will always survive a daylight test. So like I said, welcome back here anytime.
Marzy writes: "Hey Candace, interview Sonia Poulton if you want to look at the Epstein files from the UK point of view. She looked into Prince Andrew and Jimmy Savile. It's a scary deep dive. I hope the children are well. You work hard and we thank you for it."
Children are doing great. We're very blessed with a beautiful, healthy family. And yeah, it's a lot of research, and you don't want to make any mistakes, because a lot of people that were researching — this is why these series take such a long time — people that were researching are still alive, and you can see that they'll wait for you to make a mistake and then try to sue you. So you've got to fact-check, look into everything. I'm fact-checking the fact checks and working with Xavier Brossard, who has really been dedicating his life to the Epstein story for the last ten years at least. This and the British Macron story have been running side by side when he had his publication Factual Documents. So yeah, it's a lot, but it's worth it, because I think we are all kind of waking up to the fact that there's just this invisible society that runs around our society, which kind of makes us slaves. If they know that their children are quote-unquote chosen and they don't have to do anything — they're just going to make a fake resume for them and put them at the top of all these companies — and we're going to work for them, like we are the employees. Yeah, it's very scary to kind of consider the Matrix and to realize that as they always like to tip their hand — whether it's in a book or a movie — they're laughing at us. They want us to know: we are totally in control, and everything around you is actually fake.
Lastly, this person writes — I love the name, "My Sweet Muffin" — "God bless you, Kenneth. We wish you all the wealth and real estate that you can manage. May God Almighty protect you and your family. You are opening the eyes of countless conservatives. Thank you for that."
Oh, and somebody gave $100 to insult me. The handle is literally "Unknown," and they gave $100 to say "Nick Fuentes crushed you." You are welcome back. I actually think you should be here every day and write that comment for $100. I will read that comment every day as long as you give a hundred bucks. Amazing.