Candace Owens releases video footage from behind Charlie Kirk's head and connects Epstein file redactions to Israeli business associates of the Kushners
Candace Owens releases previously withheld footage and photos from the scene of Charlie Kirk's assassination, while arguing that Trump, Kash Patel, and Jared Kushner covered up Epstein file connections to protect Israeli real estate associates convicted of sex trafficking.
Summary
Candace Owens presents what she describes as a solo investigative episode connecting several major threads: the conviction of Israeli-American real estate brokers Tal, Orin, and Alain Alexander on federal sex trafficking charges; their alleged connection to Jared Kushner and their appearance — with redacted names — in the Epstein files; and what she characterizes as deliberate deception by Trump, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi regarding the contents of those files. She argues the redactions were not limited to protecting minors from child pornography, as officially stated, but were used to shield well-connected individuals. She also continues her investigation into Erika Kirk and Turning Point USA, releasing photos from inside the vehicle Charlie Kirk was transported in and video footage from behind his head at the moment of the shooting. Additionally, she presents new research into Erika Kirk's Romanian Angels charity partner Renee Crossman, whom she identifies as a self-admitted member of the Children of God cult, and she flags Turning Point Action's public attack on Congressman Thomas Massie — one of Charlie Kirk's stated favorite congressmen — as evidence of an ideological reversal under new leadership.
Key Takeaways
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Opening: Epstein files, redactions, and the Kirk assassination
Candace Owens: It's going to be a hell of a Thursday. Trump, Kash Patel, Jared Kushner — why does it now feel like everyone is implicated in the Epstein file cover-up?
A crazy question for you today: do you believe that the Epstein files may have something to do with Charlie Kirk's assassination? Because for the life of me, I could not fathom how Charlie Kirk — who was a friend to all of these people, all of these very powerful people — could have been so deeply betrayed by all of them. When he died, they all immediately wanted to turn the chapter. They weren't interested. He dedicated his adult life to empowering these people. And I just remember thinking to myself, what's going on? These people now occupy the highest offices in America. Their dear friend was just assassinated, and they seem altogether disinterested in the obvious holes in the Tyler Robinson lone shooter narrative — his wife included. Why does nobody in Charlie's world want a true investigation?
I'm now thinking that maybe it's plausible that everyone here is implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein cover-up. Do all of these people know each other through the world of New York real estate, beauty pageants, Israelis, and Eastern European models? I'm now asking myself: are they launching a world war that nobody wants, to distract us from the Epstein files? Could the world really be this evil?
And on that note, I think it is high time to share the video footage from behind Charlie's head. We will also be sharing the remaining photos that we have in our possession from inside the vehicle that Charlie was transported to the hospital in. We're going to release everything, because maybe Charlie's vision was correct. He said that he was going to die to help awaken humanity. Let's see.
Erika Kirk, the Epstein building, and Corcoran Real Estate
Candace Owens: Welcome back. Let's begin with an interesting update. Yesterday and the day before, we began breaking the news — the story that in particular Erika's involvement with Epstein's favorite modeling agency, Next Model Management, a Rothschild spinout. We broke the story that her dealings with them involved real estate in some capacity. Erika Kirk was, as we were told, the point person to the firm when it came to housing young models. More specifically, Erika dealt with apartments in a white building. They remembered that that white building was located somewhere near 68th Street between 2nd and 3rd Avenue.
A few of you sent us a building that could potentially match that very description — a building owned by Mark Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein's brother, who inherited all of his wealth. I want you to check out this article published by the New York Post. The title reads: "Exposed: Inside the New York City condo building where Jeffrey Epstein secretly kept his underage victims."
The article tells us, quote: "Newly unsealed records reveal that Jeffrey Epstein kept some of his underage victims in an apartment building just ten blocks from his Upper East Side townhouse. Address: 301 East 66th Street, a 16-story post-war condo between 1st and 2nd Avenues with a 24-hour doorman, hid another sordid operation. The files show the building functioned as a logistical hub for Epstein's world. And according to civil complaints and sworn testimony, the underage girls that he trafficked — more than a dozen apartments — also cycled between wealthy guests, notable foreign dignitaries, and Epstein staffers."
Elsewhere in the article, we learn that one victim had previously described arriving at the building and being shown a small apartment stocked with domestic comforts. She said in her 2022 account: "I remember the apartment clearly. It was relatively small and there was Dannon yogurt in the fridge and a basket of fruit and cookies on the counter. It was a gesture showing the guise of care before she was taken about nine blocks away to Epstein's townhouse at 9 East 71st Street to give him a massage." She said: "I remember feeling quite special — it was a part of the manipulation, though. 'Here we are caring for you, we are providing for you.' That's all part of the grooming process." End quote.
The article also has an embedded photo with an interesting caption. It says: "Some apartments were labeled in his address book as apartments for models." Apartments for models. Civil filings allege the condos were used to house young women brought from overseas and provided with living quarters, transportation, and other benefits to secure compliance.
This photo is also courtesy of Corcoran Real Estate. I love that the photo is courtesy of Corcoran Real Estate, because remember — the Corcoran president, according to Jeffrey Epstein's files, was a Rothschild. Why is this just giving massive conspiracy? White building right there. The person remembers Erika dealing with models. He's just putting in his phone "apartment for models." What's going on here?
Why wouldn't she simply answer an email and clarify her relationship with Next Model Management? This feels to me like a massive conspiracy which could have potentially implicated many more players who were involved in the New York City real estate scene and who also happened to radically support the nation state of Israel. Given that the Rothschilds credit themselves with having created that nation state — it wasn't biblical, it was banking — the Kushners are involved in Manhattan real estate, the Trumps are involved in Manhattan real estate.
And from where I'm sitting, it looks like Donald Trump, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi colluded to lie to the American people about the Epstein files. At the very least, we can now assert that they intentionally covered up for Jared Kushner's Israeli business friends who sold Ivanka and Jared their Miami mansion — and those men were just found guilty of sex trafficking.
Remember, Kash Patel said there was no evidence of trafficking in the files. None. Yet these Israeli-American brothers, Tal, Orin, and Alain Alexander, were indeed in the files. And we can assume that because of their relationship with Jared Kushner, they enjoyed a warm relationship with Donald Trump. They certainly visited the White House multiple times. They were even invited to the annual Hanukkah party. And I'm wondering if it's because of that that they had their last names redacted from the Epstein files. We were told that the redactions were limited to protecting us from child pornography. Well, it turns out that too was a lie, as we always knew it was.
Trump is protecting his friends. He's protecting Jared's friends. He is protecting Israel. And the redactions didn't matter in the end, thanks to the crusade of Congressman Thomas Massie, among others — whom Trump now wants primaried down in Kentucky because Israel wants him out. He's not a Zionist. The brothers were revealed because of him. And they were, like I told you, just found guilty in a major sex trafficking case.
News clip: Alexander brothers convicted on all counts
Candace Owens: Let's check out this news clip to see what sorts of people this administration is working to defend and cover for.
The news report states that three brothers have been convicted of sex trafficking after weeks of emotional testimony. A jury found that the Alexander brothers had repeatedly trafficked and engaged in unlawful sexual activity with young women. Two of the brothers rose to prominence closing high-end real estate deals in New York and Miami.
The report explains that while the Alexander brothers were found guilty of all 10 counts against them in federal district court in Manhattan, their defense team had argued the brothers were womanizers but not criminals. The jury disagreed. More than a year after the Alexander brothers were first arrested on charges including sex trafficking, a jury found the trio guilty of all 10 counts. A defense attorney representing Orin Alexander stated: "We believe in our client's innocence and we're not going to stop fighting until we prevail."
Orin and his brother Tal rose to prominence as real estate brokers to the mega-rich, with a splashy profile in the New York Times and appearances on cable business shows about their multi-million dollar sales. Alain Alexander, Orin's twin, worked as an executive for a private security firm owned by the family. The Alexander brothers worked together and with others to repeatedly and violently drug, sexually assault, and rape dozens of female victims. All three brothers were arrested in December 2024. During the trial, the jury heard from 11 women who accused the brothers of rape or sexual assault, including allegations that the Alexanders had drugged the women before assaulting them and recorded certain encounters without consent. The jury found Tal, Orin, and Alain guilty of sex trafficking charges — Tal additionally guilty of sex trafficking a minor, and Orin and Alain guilty of sexual abuse. Sentencing has been scheduled for August and the brothers face life behind bars. The Alexander brothers still face additional legal trouble in Florida, where Alain and Orin are charged with rape in state court. They have pleaded not guilty.
Kash Patel, Jared Kushner, and the mechanics of the cover-up
Candace Owens: Why are Israelis like this? I'm asking seriously.
Allow me to reiterate what's going on here. Kash Patel and the president of the United States, likely under the instruction of his son-in-law Jared Kushner — who everybody knows is running the White House — he was running the White House back in 2020. He's the reason Trump has already admitted that "Jared told me to bomb abroad, he told me they might preemptively strike." Everything Trump does is because Jared Kushner tells him to. On paper Trump is running the White House, but it's always been Jared Kushner. He was the one that also told him to lock everything down during COVID.
What is going on here is they have just proven they were willing to lie via redactions to the American people to protect rapists — Israeli rapists and sex traffickers — because they donate to the IDF. You can apparently traffic and rape human beings as long as you support Israel. That's the most important thing.
Oddly enough, trafficking just keeps coming up — it's a common theme that nobody expected. Throughout our investigation into Charlie Kirk and who killed Charlie Kirk, we keep coming up with themes of human sex trafficking and Israel. The unjustified redaction of the Alexander brothers' names adds a lot more smoke to that mysterious meeting that Andrew Kulvette and other Turning Point USA affiliates had with top brass in the West Wing the literal day before the Epstein files dropped. Could they be redacting things and doing favors for their friends? A little hush-hush meeting that Kash Patel wanted to help Andrew Kulvette camouflage by way of faking a Charlie Kirk Live episode. "I'm calling in. I never do this. Haha." Meanwhile, they're together in DC.
I think it's fair to ask what other pieces of human filth this administration would be willing to help for Israel. Trump has proven he will do anything for Israel. He will send your sons and your daughters to die for them. That actually seems to be the plan they are imparting upon us right now. Poor Charlie for having held him in higher estimation.
Erika Kirk's push into high schools and the Arkansas proclamation
Candace Owens: This brings me to the utterly deranged campaign to force Erika Kirk upon the masses — the widow who was clearly not grieving, the media dismissing her obviously problematic past, no interest in her obviously problematic past or her obviously problematic mother. And now it seems they're taking it a step further, trying to get Erika's Turning Point into high schools all across America. That's been the push. They're even trying to establish something in Ireland. Ireland, wake up. Pay attention. Korea, wake up. Pay attention. It's weird and it's problematic.
Let me ask you: with everything that we now know, how do you feel about the prospect of Erika Kirk, Tyler Bowyer, the Farnsworths, and the Turning Point staff being heavily endorsed for high school classrooms in particular — because that's what's happening. It's Club America. That's what it's called.
Yesterday, Sarah Huckabee Sanders — and yes, that is Mike Huckabee's daughter, which may be relevant to the theme of Israel — signed a proclamation with Erika Kirk by her side, announcing her support for every high school in Arkansas to adopt Club America. I want you to watch Erika in this clip. Pay attention to her mannerisms because everything about her screams fraud. She's going to put on this sheepish, scared persona. Let's watch.
In the clip, Sanders says: "We are here to welcome one of the conservative movement's most talented, most outspoken, and most faithful leaders, Erika Kirk, to our great state. We're so proud to have her and so proud of the incredible work that she is doing to help encourage students across the country to engage and join Club America, which we're launching here in Arkansas, and we're just honored to have you."
Erika Kirk responds: "Thank you. God bless you. We're so grateful, and thank you for honoring Charlie and his legacy and his mission to have a Club America on every high school chapter across the country. God bless you guys, and thank you."
It's just so performative and it gives me the ick — because somehow, as we have demonstrated, child sex abuse allegation scandals seem to follow that sheepish girl. It's never her. It's the US Marines, Colonel Otto Buster, everyone around her that seems adjacent to these sorts of scandals. She's just unlucky that way.
Renee Crossman, United Hands Romania, and the Children of God cult
Candace Owens: Take for example United Hands Romania — that's the organization that Erika partnered with on her Romanian Angels project. She partnered with an organization known as United Hands Romania. And something that immediately flagged me as weird is that when giving an interview about United Hands, Erika mentioned that the Romanian orphans did not trust the woman running it. Listen to what Erika says about this woman.
In the clip, Erika Kirk explains: "The woman that is the boots on the ground in Romania for United Hands Romania Association — the head of that lives in Ohio. She has all of these backpacks and back-to-school supplies and all these different things for the kids that she wants to send over there. And our contact who was at the base in Constanța is no longer there, and the people who are there don't trust her because they don't have a connection to her. And so I have literally been praying to figure out how to get ahold of someone at that base."
The kids don't trust an adult woman to give them presents. That flagged me as very odd. Children not trusting a woman so much that they don't want to accept gifts from her — I've been around kids, I have four kids, I have a lot of toddlers around. I've heard of shy kids, kids that need to warm up to strangers, but what Erika is describing is a woman who has been involved with that orphanage for over a decade. That signals to me that the kids know something about her. There's a reason they don't trust her even when she is holding gifts. That was my gut instinct.
So I went to investigate who that woman was, and was gratefully sent an article by Romanian readers — thank you so much for the work you've done here. This article was published in 2017. Erika discusses her partnership in this article. The woman's name is Renee Crossman. Erika thanks her in this article. The quote reads: "We have formed a partnership with the Antonio Placement Center in Constanța. And as we promised, we are doing everything possible to take this friendship further for the benefit of Romanian children. We fell in love with these children and with the idea of repeated help over time. So we included this action in our list of international initiatives. I am happy to collaborate with United Hands Romania Association and Renee Crossman, the president of this organization, but also with the representatives of the Antonio Placement Center."
So I looked further into Renee Crossman and what her background is, and a clue as to why maybe the children don't trust her. Vulnerable children don't trust Renee. It might be because Renee is a member of a cult. You may have heard of this cult — it used to be known as Children of God. There are documentaries dedicated to discussing the Children of God cult.
I'm going to read verbatim words written by a Romanian investigative team, because this is going to sound familiar. This team began looking into United Hands, began looking into Renee Crossman, and the religious sect she came from — the Children of God, which is now referred to as The Family. It was founded by evangelist David Berg, born in California in 1919.
The article tells us: "Berg had a very turbulent life, one that included incestuous sexual relations with a cousin and even one of his daughters, Fafy, whom he made into a sexual partner when she reached the age of 12. Around 1970, Berg began aggressive proselytizing, especially among young hippies whom he convinced to leave their jobs, give up education, family, and all material possessions in order to join the Children of God. In the United States and Canada, as well as in London and other major cities of Europe, Australia, and Latin America, Berg was in the habit of finding justifications for sins through prophetic words, arrogantly proclaiming himself to be God's prophet for the end times. Berg instructed the Children of God to spread throughout the world — first in Europe in 1971 and later to reach every continent by the mid-1970s. The Children of God began calling themselves the Family of Love. Sexual excesses inevitably led to child sex. Faithful to his personal history, Berg claimed that incest and sex involving minors were permitted, and thus soon a series of cases appeared of mothers and fathers becoming sexually intimate with their sons and daughters, and even of young children committing sexual acts with other children or with adult members. Mixing his sexual immorality with occultism, Berg claimed that he maintained relationships with the entire pantheon of pagan goddesses including Aphrodite, Diana, the goddesses of Atlantis, Makumba — which is the name of the Afro-Brazilian cult similar to voodoo — and many others, while continuing to proclaim salvation through faith in Jesus Christ." End quote.
Occultism, weird sex stuff, doing things in the name of Christ, access to children. Back in 2018, Megyn Kelly did a profile piece and interview with a woman who left the cult and wanted to share her story. Her name is Christina Babin. Listen to what Christina told Megyn Kelly about her upbringing.
In 1976, David Berg introduced what he called "Flirty Fishing," which encouraged female members to show God's love through sexual relationships with potential converts. As for young girls like Christina, she says they were encouraged to engage in what Berg called "sexual sharing." She describes: "Father David had sent out a letter to everybody and said that children should be shown how to have sex, and an adult couple came and got me in the night and showed me how to have sex. And I knew by that time that women were supposed to be prostitutes and we weren't supposed to say no to sex and that sex was part of our life. So I knew mentally what was expected of me and what I was supposed to feel. But when it happened, it didn't feel right, it didn't feel good. And I thought there was something wrong with me."
To be clear: Renee Crossman, Erika's partner on Romanian Angels — the woman the children, according to Erika, do not trust — is a self-admitted member of this cult. She has not been accused of any wrongdoing. The US Marines that she partnered with were the ones who would go on to face accusations. But Renee Crossman herself has not been accused of anything, and she defends the cult, which was subsequently instructed to disperse and hide themselves in the world of nonprofits according to the investigative piece.
Are we to believe the US Marines didn't catch that in a background check on Renee Crossman? She's an American. I would imagine there was a background check involved. Everything and everyone around Erika — just not Erika.
Why is it that everything about Turning Point right now reminds me of a religious cult? The way Erika speaks, her mannerisms, her inflection, her saying Turning Point is her "family." They call themselves a family. This is my family. What are you — a CEO or are you not a CEO? Her choosing to have Stacy the chief fundraiser by her side rather than her biological family members after her husband was assassinated. Her defense of sexual deviant Tyler Bowyer. The way in which they are trying to seed the public and convince them that this is what God wanted, that God ordained this. Erika is so godly she cannot get a sentence out without saying the Lord. And I'm going to be honest — it creeps me out. The whispering creeps me out. It does not fill me with any sense of light. In fact, it fills me with quite the opposite. I feel uncomfortable. I feel like I am watching a religious cult try to indoctrinate the masses.
I felt like Charlie's entire assassination was a cult, as I presented to you — like it was a cult and it was meant to hypnotize the world. The whispering, the staging. Let's go back and actually watch this clip of Erika on Jesse Watters where I'm speaking about the whispering making me uncomfortable.
In the clip, Erika Kirk says: "And I truly believe that if the Lord — which this does not happen — but if the Lord gave him an option to return back to earth, and if the Lord said, 'This is what your death is going to be the catalyst for, do you want to go back and exchange it?' — he'd say no."
He'd say no. He'd want his kids to grow up alone. Again, this is a part of brainwashing. That's how I feel. I have a right to feel that Turning Point has turned into something else. I feel it was infiltrated. I feel Erika is very obviously taking it in a direction that makes me uncomfortable. Everything we've seen about her background and the manner in which she was raised screams fraud to me. She lies pathologically, as if she herself was brainwashed, as if she doesn't know that she's lying. It should tell you that something is not right here.
And now we have to go max for Charlie. When I look at all the players on the board, when I look at her relationship with Trump, when I look at the way they are continuing to defend her and to tell us that she must be accepted — no, everything in me screams just the opposite.
Releasing the photos and video footage from September 10th
Candace Owens: When we get back, we're going to be releasing the remaining photos and the video evidence that we have from September 10th.
So why today? Why now? It's been six months, and I think we all feel pretty confident that Turning Point is undergoing some sort of brand hostile takeover at the very least. Zionists are in there. They didn't kill him, but they are going to force people that Charlie didn't like to the helm of this company, and they're going to defend those individuals. And we are very much entitled to that opinion that something's not right.
In the beginning I was not sure about Erika. I thought maybe she was dealing with a lot behind the scenes, trying to figure out where the snakes are. I do not feel that way today. I now feel her motives are impure, and that's putting it lightly. I now know for a fact she is dishonest. Her background — pathological lies all throughout it.
The internet must have everything, because the people who should be defending Charlie are not. They are going around trying to spread what amounts to fed slop, trying to guilt us, trying to tell us that we're demonic for recognizing that something we were all made to look at was an occult ceremony. I believe Charlie's death — the setting of it, everything — was planned down to the tea. I believe he was sacrificed.
So we want to share all the evidence that we have, so that the people who I bet Charlie wishes he was friends with — the YouTubers who have spent time on this, the people who have put things together trying to figure out what happened on that day — I bet he wishes those were his associates and not the people he spent so much time building up.
Let's begin with the photos inside the van. We had only shown one. Here is a closer look. It does very much look to me like there is some sort of shattered glass in the back. I know some people think this could be a part of his mic that he had on him. And I just want to say that I do see that all across the back seat, which is interesting. I know Baron Coleman, among others, is working on examining why they told this story about how Brian Harpool was hanging out of the SUV, which wasn't the circumstance when they pulled out. Hopefully this helps.
Here is another photo — viewer discretion advised. They had told us this story about how they had so much gauze and all this stuff. What we were able to find is basically what you see in the corner there that kind of looks like a UPS ticket. What that actually is is Insta-Clot, which is essentially instant gauze. And there's just one on the floor. So unless he opened one and put the rest of the packaging in his bag, which would be unusual, there's only one on the floor that we could see.
If you are one of the people who has been working on this story — this is another side angle — hopefully you'll see me in the online universe and I can share these photos with you, because this now feels important. I have no understanding as to why Turning Point USA would not share every piece of footage they have. Obviously the feds are not telling us the truth. And Kash Patel has been caught lying. I don't understand how Kash Patel is still in office. But I guess if you lie for the right people — which seems to always be Israel — you will be protected. Even if you rape people, which we've just learned, you will be protected. Redacted at the very least.
Now we're going to get into this video. This is a long video. I told you how this came about. At the beginning I didn't suspect anything with Turning Point — obviously that changed. After I had a phone call with Terrell, I recognized he was acting very strange, lying, saying he didn't know how to send a file. I was genuinely reaching out because I thought I could help clear his name, because people thought he was suspicious for taking down the camera. I thought he was going to give me a perfectly reasonable reason as to why he did that — like, "Oh, I was just instructed by the feds." But it was excuse after excuse, and I didn't understand why he was lying, saying he didn't know how to send a file when you run an audio-visual company, Terrell Farnsworth. Now I've learned about his dad, his uncles, his cousins, and their relationship with Lori Frantzve dating back to 2013, and it's all not looking good. None of this is looking good.
Anyway, let's get to some of this video. We're going to scrub through this. And if you're just on audio, you'll obviously need to come cut to video because I can't really describe it. The question is being asked at this moment right here. We had assumed initially that that was his recorder or something. I can confirm — you'll see later — that it's whipping fast and looks white when it whips fast, but that is in fact his necklace. And I find that for some reason very strange that the necklace goes up first.
By the way, there's no gore in this. You don't really need viewer discretion because, as kind of broke the internet, the bullet didn't go through. It did not go through. It didn't even cause any sort of a mess. His perfectly white t-shirt was white until the moment that he hit the ground.
There you go — pause there. So you can see that is his necklace. Everybody had a personal story about Charlie's necklace, which struck me as very odd. Erika, Frank tells the story about how he came out to get his backpack from the car as the feds were searching it at the hospital and he saw Charlie's necklace on his backpack, which was in the car, and the feds said, "We were looking for that necklace." Really? Why were the feds looking for the necklace? How did they know he had a necklace? That's very strange. Erika has told several stories about the necklace and how precious it was to him and how grateful she was that she got it back. I think even Brian Harpool had a story about the necklace. I've got to go back and look, but everyone's got a story about the necklace. It seems like a strange focus of that day.
So I want to just point out that it is the necklace that is hanging. You can see that. At some points you can even observe the chain. Again, this is after Charlie is hit. So you are seeing zero blood heading backward. That feels wrong to me. That instantly felt wrong to me for what they are telling us took place here, which is a .30-06. It's not even enough to pretend that this was like a miracle event where Charlie's neck somehow stopped it. It gets even crazier when you say but it didn't even cause any blood. Everything you saw was blood that came because an artery was hit and that went forward. I will never buy the narrative that a .30-06 is what killed Charlie Kirk. I'm just not accepting that narrative whatsoever.
We can continue and point out some more portions here. Charlie was not down — he was always also upward, which I know a lot of people know things about. Is that a recorder? The magnet clasp right there. Some people were wondering about the magnet clasp. That's it. It's still on him. I know those things are very powerful. John Bray explained to me that the magnet clasp would have stayed on, but what was behind it would have fallen off, because he has a theory — I think a well-adapted theory — that the road microphone is what was shattered in the backseat of the car. I wanted to show that as well so you could see that.
The only place you see any blood drops is on his hand, because blood went forward. We can keep scrubbing through here. Dan actually pushes him — Dan takes him to the ground, which he should do — but I think it's important to note what's on the table there. Some people thought that that guy had grabbed something on the table, and I had confirmed to you that he did not, because I saw that. And when he slides across — yeah, there's nothing on the table that he grabs. There's a book, it looks like maybe Charlie had a notebook. You can see when his hands first come on the table, he does not grab anything. So that is a conspiracy theory we can shut down.
And you can see what's around him more broadly — speakers, and then beyond that we just have some crowd shots. We're just scrubbing through the parts that are obviously just him talking.
And that's it. I feel it is our duty to share that with the public, because our officials, the feds, politicians — they've failed us. They have been so dishonest. This has been the year of really seeing how it actually operates inside DC. Everyone is disgusting, left and right. There are a few exceptions, but altogether it's just a place of filth. DC is a place of filth. I really do believe that they have to sell themselves, sell their souls, and they've all just made their bed. Like, yeah, I'm going to go to hell, but I don't know — maybe they think they're going to come back from hell.
I know that people who worship the occult believe in reincarnation, and so all they care about — since they know they have no access to heaven — is making sure that they are princes of this world, so to speak. They do worship the occult, and it comes up as different names: Frankism, Sabbatianism, Children of God. But really what is manifesting is the same ideology redressing itself as something else, and inevitably children are harmed. That's what it is.
Thomas Massie, Turning Point's reversal, and Charlie Kirk's documented positions
Candace Owens: Look no further for evidence of Turning Point having reversed course on Charlie's perspectives than what's going on with Thomas Massie. I said he pushed for the Epstein files to be released, and so Trump is really angry at him and wants to make sure he gets primaried down in Kentucky. The facts are that Charlie Kirk named Thomas Massie as one of his favorite congressmen. You don't have to take my word for it. You can take Charlie's.
In a clip, Charlie Kirk says: "One of the most exciting developments from last week's negotiations is the new Church Committee. And one of the members of that new Church Committee is one of my favorite members of Congress. He loves the Constitution. He loves liberty. He's honest and he's tough and he's going to really go after the intel agencies. It's Thomas Massie, who is just terrific from Kentucky. Congressman Massie, welcome to the program."
I had private conversations with Charlie. He loved Thomas Massie. So you can imagine Thomas Massie was a bit confused when Turning Point Action — which is run by Tyler Bowyer and which kicks money back to Erika's mother via Super PAC — tweeted out that Thomas Massie was a RINO who needed to be replaced. This is Turning Point USA, that had Ben Shapiro open for AFest behind Erika, and they're shouting out Thomas Massie as being a RINO because he won't vote for more funding to go to Ukraine and Israel.
This is a real tweet. "MAGA rallies are back. Trump haters are on notice." And you can see why Thomas Massie might have been a little bit confused. He wasn't the only one — X was apparently also confused, because look at that community note. "Rep. Thomas Massie was one of Charlie Kirk's favorite congressmen." Just a little note there. Stop. You just can't make this up. You cannot make up that they are now being fact-checked on what Charlie believed versus what they are now pushing, which is the opposite. To be hit with a community note when you are the organization that purports to be carrying on Charlie's legacy — it is just so embarrassing and it's also sick.
I'm glad the community note was able to inform Turning Point that Massie was indeed one of Charlie's favorite congressmen. Thomas Massie tweeted back asking a simple question: "What has gotten into y'all?" He just wants to know what has gotten into y'all, and then shows a tweet with Charlie reiterating "one of my favorite congressmen, Thomas Massie" — and it's been his favorite congressman from at least 2016 all the way through to 2023.
I wanted to answer Thomas Massie's question. I wanted to help him. What is going on? You want to know? Turning Point USA used to be a student organization founded and run by Charlie Kirk, Boy Genius. It has now been taken over and it's more akin to LBJ USA. They are reversing course on everything Charlie believed in, and it's not subtle. They're not even trying to keep up appearances. I thought, if I was being smart about it — if I was staging the Zionist ideology takeover — I would at least keep up appearances for one year. Just the people Charlie really loved, everybody knew. "We're carrying on his legacy." And then maybe a year later, I start introducing Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro, being like, "Oh well, you know, it's been a year and Charlie would have wanted this." No. They couldn't do it. It was like they were under pressure. Like they had to instantly bring it all out — bring out the people that Charlie didn't like, doing interviews with the New York Times, everyone who gave him grief while he was alive. They didn't even try to fake it.
Viewer questions and comments
Candace Owens: Top comments. Ocean City writes: "If Erika runs for president, Candace should run independent so they can debate." Maybe, only so we can debate. I have zero interest in running for president. I am so done with politics. But I would be interested in debating or even just conversing publicly with Erika Kirk. I don't think it's going to happen otherwise, so since they're probably just going to put her on a debate stage, maybe I will have to meet her there.
This next user writes: "My son was born yesterday and he said he also doesn't believe Erika's crap." Yeah, it's hard — it's a struggle being not born yesterday, and apparently even people that are literally born yesterday are not buying any of this.
Project Constitution Right writes: "Students all over the country are revolting in protest of Turning Point and Erika Kirk. They don't want them speaking at their schools, churches, or mandating high school chapters. We are winning." I did see they were protesting in Arkansas. Good. These people are minors. They don't need a proclamation from a Huckabee to decide if they want to open a student club. I do not think Turning Point — until they are ready to fully answer questions regarding Erika Kirk's past — should be given access to minors. Full stop. This is pretty basic stuff.
There have been some instances that have happened. We're hearing this. We're hearing that. Maybe there is a reasonable explanation for why Erika Kirk was at Model Management and at this white building, but people should hear it. People should hear it because at the end of the day no one wants to share the wrong information. But the silence on things that are so easy to respond to — if someone messaged me and said, "Hey Candace, we heard that back when you were working in New York City you had keys to a white building and you were ushering in models," I'd be like, "I have no idea what you're talking about. This is not true. Do not print that." There's no shred of truth to that. She's not doing that. She's not doing that at all.
Madison Melker writes: "I have been donating to Turning Point USA since before Charlie's death. Ever since, I receive letters at least once every couple of weeks asking for more money to help continue Charlie's vision. Kind of odd to me since you are the one that is supposedly grifting." You didn't know that his vision was to be on a license plate? You didn't know that his vision was for everyone to send their 401Ks? Everything is his vision — everything is his vision except for the words that came out of his mouth that actually painted his vision. They want you to ignore all of that. They have zero awareness of themselves, given the audacity to call anybody grifting, and their refusal to say what Charlie actually thought as opposed to trying to direct the ghost of Charlie to say the opposite.
James Lee writes about the low bun — the "battle bun." Batomore writes: "Battle bun merch." It might be a thing. I didn't know this was a thing. Johnny America writes: "Hair pulled back, that expression on her face, she bowed to go off." I did not know this, but I was doing it subconsciously. I think it is a thing. When I get fed up, there is a battle bun happening. You learn things about yourself on the internet sometimes that are not true, and then sometimes you learn things that are true. This has been a stunning development that happens to be true.
Kai writes: "Have you seen the upcoming Turning Point USA events? The speakers are Erika, J.D., Donald Jr., Karoline Leavitt, Lawrence Jones, Matt Walsh, etc. I received it via email and I cussed them out. I cannot live here anymore." I have not seen the upcoming Turning Point USA events that are coming soon, but I would like to. I'm always looking forward to Erika speaking more.
Moderator Marcy writes: "Red alert, Candace. Four drones were stolen from Fort Campbell." Oh, that's totally normal. The four drones were not stolen from a military base — they were given to someone from somebody on the military base, and it's probably Israel. Let's just be frank about things. The only people who get to steal our tech and pretend to be confused about where it went — if this were just a regular person who stole something, they would be arrested, probably shot and killed in four seconds. So yeah, Israel is doing some war stuff. They probably need drones. That's my guess.
Corey Henry writes: "I can trim Ben's roach antler eyebrows — we may find the files in there." I did see the thing going on with his eyebrows. It is noticeable. The eyebrows are growing. The yarmulke is growing as well, and I don't know what it's about, but we will continue to monitor any developments as the internet notices.
Mira Costa writes: "The Daily Wire and Jeremy Boring attacks are so over the top. I am curious to know who funds them as they have become so irrelevant. Your next investigation should be titled 'Becoming Boring: The Tragedy of Not Being Special.'" Genuinely, I wouldn't even be interested. I just want them to stop talking about me. The company went down in flames because of Jeremy. He is a special kind of psycho. At least with Ben, you know what you're going to get. Jeremy just invents things out of his head that have no basis in truth, and that's a very scary person to be in the position of CEO. The other day he had like five interviews about me and then when I replied on X he said, "Typical Candace having a meltdown responding to my five interviews." Anyway, let's just stop talking about Jeremy.
Katie Bliss writes: "Tucker has been a voice I look to lately for insight. His latest with Brett Weinstein was one for the books. Brett pushed and made his views clear that the Charlie story does not add up. I wish Tucker would open up more on this."
I would like that too. I think it's hard for Tucker for a couple of reasons. First, he has relationships there. Tucker — I always describe him as like a golden retriever. Everybody gets along with Tucker. The people that don't get along with Tucker, that's a pretty good measure that they're just not a good person, and it's usually just because of Israel. That's the one topic. And Tucker just genuinely wants to get along with people, which is a good quality to have in the political space. He doesn't have an ego. He admits when he's wrong and he will disagree with you lovingly. He comes across on a show exactly as he is in person. I've always been a massive fan of his, and I think he is inclined to want to see the good in people, even when things are changing. I don't know how much he's following the investigation into Charlie Kirk. I know he's spoken up and said some of the things make entirely no sense, but I would love to hear more about what he thinks about the investigation and what he thinks about Kash Patel. I should probably go watch his interview with Brett Weinstein, because I haven't seen it yet, and you're saying it's one for the books and that Brett made his position clear. I think now that's the rational, reasonable position — it kind of always was from the very beginning. As soon as we got to a .30-06, the reasonable position to have is that they are lying to us about everything, which implies this was a deep state assassination the likes of which have not been seen since the assassination of JFK, which also involved Israel.
Seven Sheets writes: "This is so terribly sad. You are fierce and brave, heroic even. We would be in darkness without you. In faith and prayer, may we all be so brave."
Everyone is being brave. I want to say that. I sometimes get into that place where I'm like, could the world really be this evil? And then I remember that it's been six months and we have not let up one inch on the Charlie Kirk investigation, and that is thanks to the YouTubers, everyone giving a different piece, looking into things — whether it's Nissi, who looked into the Jillian stuff; Baron Coleman and his monologues; John Bray, who's looking into the microphone theory and why there was that explosion that happened here in Tennessee. By the way, John Bray, you should probably look into Nella Buckman's family. I'm only saying that because she gave a ton of money to Erika Kirk. She's involved in sex trafficking charities, and her reason for being involved in sex trafficking charities makes me uncomfortable. I saw her give an interview where she said it was because her first husband cheated on her a lot with sex workers and that made her want to understand sex workers — I don't know about that as a motivation for getting involved with sex trafficking charities. But that family is involved, the Buckman family, with factories in Tennessee — not that specific one that blew up, but factories in Tennessee, to be sure.
Also, as a random APB — she adopted her kids. I can't figure out from where. I'm just very curious as to where Nella Buckman adopted her children from. I can't find that information. She gives tons of interviews, she's very vocal, she speaks at events, she's one of those donors who wants to speak at all the events. If you can find out — and maybe I missed it, it's very possible — if she's ever spoken about where she adopted her two daughters from, which she adopted in her first marriage — I think her maiden name is Yaw, Y-A-W — I would like you to email that information to me. To be clear, I am not asking anyone to go stalk her. I'm saying, in terms of what is publicly available online, how do two kids get adopted and I don't know where they're adopted from? That's very interesting.
Please email us more tips at candaceowens.com. Also, if you were involved in the modeling world and you maybe stayed in an apartment which Erika property managed, opened the keys for, spoke to you about — whatever it was at Next Model Management — we want to hear directly from the models. More tips at candaceowens.com, directly from the employees at Next Model Management. We are not letting up.
And I think that is the most encouraging thing — they're sweating. They want a world war. Every time the pedophiles get caught, they want a world war. That's what I've learned. Look at what was going on in Vienna — look up old Vienna, Sigmund Freud and his boys and what they were doing to kids there, and then just in time a World War happens, smashing historical records, reintroducing themselves as the victims. These same people, hiding what they did. You will always know them by what they do. They can't stop doing the same thing, which is harming children.
So you should be optimistic, because we're talking about it. It's mainstreamed. We can talk about the occult. No one cares about these psychos screaming online demanding a consequence for speech. We see what their threats are. We see what their games are. They're going to impoverish you. Trump is allowing that, by the way. Macron abuses a kid, who is now suing Candace for talking about it. What kind of president doesn't make a statement? That is a threat to all Americans — another sitting president is suing a podcaster for speaking about the reality of what happened, the reality of what he is married to. Missing military files and Trump does nothing. What does that tell you? He's impotent.
Do you know what else that tells you? Jared Kushner's dad — Trump, despite his record, makes him the ambassador to France. France, by the way, I have told you guys repeatedly, was there on the day of Charlie's assassination. And I have made that statement and the White House has not disputed it, have they? People online say, "Oh, it's crazy, it's a conspiracy." But wouldn't the White House just say that's not true?
And you should go through the list of his presidential pardons. It's just like a who's who of Jewish criminals, kind of amazing. And it's one thing to give someone a pardon, but it's another thing to give them power. You're now the ambassador of France. Yeah, it's a lot. It's a lot going on. And I regret that I didn't see a lot of this sooner, but you know, you learn with time. And when you learn the stuff, you share the information.
Are they just going to come after all of us? Just throw up gang signs? Are they just going to mass murder a bunch of Americans for waking up and knowing what's going on? Are they going to pass speech laws? Are they going to send us to the gulags? I don't know. What I do know is that we will see you guys on Monday.