Candace Owens covers occultism in power, Charlie Kirk's assassination, and Trump's betrayal of his base
Solo episode of the Candace podcast with Candace Owens.
Summary
Candace Owens opens with an extended argument that occult and Freemasonic practice is real, present, and operating at the highest levels of government and culture — not fantasy. She connects this framework directly to the assassination of Charlie Kirk, arguing he was ritually sacrificed, that the manner of his death and its public broadcast were intentional, and that Erika Kirk's subsequent behavior reveals her as a psychopath and possible handler. Owens then turns to Donald Trump, whom she describes as a traitor who has abandoned every promise made to his base — on peace, on the Epstein files, on health, and on sovereignty — in service of Israel and its donors. She closes with the argument that no American son or daughter should enlist in the military given the current direction of US foreign policy, a statement that drew calls for her imprisonment from Bill Ackman.
Key Takeaways
FULL TRANSCRIPT
The Occult Is Real and Operating at the Highest Levels
Candace Owens: The topic of witchcraft and spellcasting is reserved really for the category of fantasy — Hocus Pocus or Harry Potter. What sort of crazy person would believe that ancient pagan practices are still happening in the real world? Okay, maybe in some remote third-world village in Africa, but in the developed western world at the very top of government? You would be mad to even suggest it — even when it's actually in our faces.
Take for example a recent Paris fashion show collection from a brand known as Matier Fal. That translates to "feel matter." Wow, must have really been an inspired show. But don't you dare take it a step further and think that these people could be into some dark stuff. That would make you, again, a crazy person.
What about the much-celebrated visual artist to the stars — the Serbian one? She's also an artist to the politicians. She does spirit cooking. Literally, that is what was in those emails. Marina Abramovic. She puts on performances in front of the most powerful people in the world. Performances like in 1974 when she sought to, quote, "re-evoke the energy of extreme bodily pain using a large petroleum-drenched pentagram which the artist lit on fire at the start of the performance. Standing outside of the pentagram, Abramovic cut her nails, her toenails, and her hair. When she finished with each, she threw the clippings into the flames, creating a burst of light each time, burning the pentagram, representing a physical and mental purification."
That's just art, guys. Don't think a step further. That's just art.
And on the matter of science — even when it's in our faces, like when the world's leading nuclear physicists are caught cloaked before a statue of Shiva stabbing a woman in an occult ceremony for CERN — well, that's just science. The best science. The most ingenious people. And I would actually agree that it is modern science. In fact, the entire thrust of what was deemed the scientific revolution — a move away from the natural order of things and toward empiricism and rationality — began because of a long, organized Freemasonic effort to remove humanity from our innate spiritual understanding.
They wanted you to know that you can now ignore your God-given instincts. You can set aside your subconscious — that subconscious that comes online and lets you know something is not right. You can just set that aside and trust the experts instead. In fact, the experts constantly reinforce that our subconscious is wrong, or weird, or in some cases immoral — devilish even. You want to go see your grandmother while she's dying in the middle of COVID? What are you, Satan? If you don't listen to Dr. Fauci, that's who you're being guided by. Because there's no greater source of authority in their world than the government, which they control. That's the idea.
Candace's Premonition Before Charlie's Assassination
And I promise you — on everything — that when Savannah, my manager, came down the stairs and delivered the news that Charlie had been shot, I went into my husband's office and I cried, and I immediately said to him, "He was betrayed. Charlie was betrayed." And my husband said back to me, "You don't know that. We don't know anything yet." And I said, "I know."
Now, empirically, that argument fails. I get it. But no one can explain why or how I had the sense of dread in the very week leading up to Charlie's assassination. No one can offer why I knew that there was danger coming specifically to a school, and why I felt that it was related to bees — why the feeling was so overwhelming that I hired extra security, took my podcast off air, and pulled my children out of school. I had never experienced a dread like that in my life. Ever.
No one can also explain or even offer an explanation as to how exactly Charlie knew he was going to die young, and that his death would specifically be related to Turning Point USA. He said he knew from the moment he signed on the dotted line that he was going to die young. What exactly is the expert explanation for that deep internal knowing that he had — that has now been proven correct? There isn't one. What Charlie sensed was obviously right.
Charlie Kirk Was Betrayed — and Likely Sacrificed
The moment Charlie was shot, I knew what happened to him was not random. He was betrayed. Charlie Kirk was the first casualty of the war in Iran. I'm certain of that. And it's deeper than that. I am now of the opinion that he was likely sacrificed. And I want to tell you why I got there.
You guys know, if you're part of my book club, I've been doing a lot of research into Freemasonry. About a month ago, while we took a break to prepare for our Bride of Charlie series, someone sent me something known as a Freemason Bible. I knew these existed because of my study of Sigmund Freud and the fact that he had inherited one from his father. The backstory of this particular one came with a handwritten letter. A 33rd-degree Freemason out in Oklahoma died, and all of his belongings were left in a home that was eventually auctioned off. The person who acquired the home — a relative of his — went in and burnt everything in it, thinking it was obviously carrying bad spirits. But he, for some reason, had the sense that he should keep this one item. He kept it in the back of his truck for over a decade. When he saw me covering the history of Freemasonry, he felt that was the reason he had kept it all those years. So he just sent it to me to provide further insight into what they believe and practice at the top of Freemasonry.
This is not your granddad's Freemason lodge. That is not what 33rd-degree Freemasonry is.
So I flipped through it — after we did douse it in holy water — and within the very first pages there was a pentagram with various illustrations inside it and notes around it. At the bottom, pointing to the middle, it says: "place of sacrifice or worship." So I want you to note that in this Freemason Bible, it illustrates that a sacrifice must be made in the center of a pentagon. Five sides, like a house. And I thought: how curious that Charlie was indeed seated in the center of a pentagon when he was killed.
The Seal of Solomon and Occult Symbolism
It was my independent study into Sigmund Freud that led me to learning about B'nai B'rith, the Jewish Freemasonic group whom I believe have been running our country since at least the Civil War. I've done my best to consume and learn about what it is they believe and practice. This is occult mysticism. The satanic panic that happened was real. Children are being harmed. They have been harmed in occult ceremonies for a very long time. This is an ancient practice, and this is not to be confused with Judaism in any way. In fact, they rely on you confusing it. In no shape or form does this have anything to do with any of the monotheistic religions. Judaism is merely a mask that these pagan occultists wear. Just like Christianity is one of the masks that they wear.
The Star of David, as they term it, is in fact an occult symbol meant to represent King Solomon's ring. It is quite literally known as the Seal of Solomon. This is on Wikipedia — that accessible. It reads: "It is often depicted in the shape of either a hexagram or a pentagram." In mystic Jewish lore, the ring is variously described as having given Solomon the power to command the supernatural. Due to the proverbial wisdom of Solomon, it came to be seen as an amulet, a talisman, or a symbol or character in medieval magic, Renaissance magic, occultism, and alchemy.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is literal witchcraft. We cannot beat these people and we cannot win if we refuse to even recognize what it is we are up against. We have to recognize what it is and who it is we are up against. And again, it has nothing to do with Christianity and nothing to do with Judaism. That is why, as further stipulated on this Wikipedia page, the Seal of Solomon was once featured on the flag of Nigeria and the flag of Morocco — those are not known to be Jewish countries.
Freemasons worship Solomon as the master architect. They believe that he gave them the keys to build and therefore control societies. This is how you build a matrix, in effect. That is the reason why Aleister Crowley — who was a master occultist — created an entire religion around this and put together a series of books, a series of pentacles meant to summon various spirits. They are intentionally summoning demons. The first book he wrote was called The Book of Evil Spirits. Covered in the Star of David.
I believe that the manner of Charlie's death was also intended to cast a spell. That's the only conclusion I keep arriving at. I kept asking the question: why did they broadcast this? Making us watch Charlie die was diabolical.
Father Ripinger on "The Revealing of the Method"
Although this priest I'm about to play is discussing Satanism more broadly — not in the context of Charlie Kirk — I want you to take a listen to what he says. This is Father Ripinger. He is going to describe the nature of this constant symbolism, this obsession with almost having to reveal what they're doing while gaslighting us.
Father Ripinger: The technical term we tend to use for that is called "the revealing of the method." Basically, it can be connected to a curse — they could curse something so that its distribution becomes more extensive and more people watch it. But a lot of times what that is, is that even though it's a cult and the fact that it's hidden, there is still a side to diabolic psychology that even when they remain hidden, they still want to show themselves in some way. They still want to reveal themselves in something. They can't help it. You see it with Satanists, you see it with Freemasons when they're involved in certain things. They just tend to reveal stuff. But their hope is that even in the revealing, you don't know. There's a sadistic delight they get out of basically putting it to you without you even knowing it.
Candace Owens: Yes, that is accurate. It is diabolical, and they are clearly sadistic in what they are doing. And of course there is an element of it they enjoy — to gaslight you right after they do these sorts of things.
That piece about symbolism being overt and in your face is also made clear in the very early pages of this Freemason Bible. It states: "It has been correctly stated that symbolism constitutes the very essence of Freemasonry. Freemasonry is essentially the science of symbolism." Further down, it offers a section entitled "The Science of Symbolism Explained." It reads: "A symbol or an emblem is an occult representation of something unknown or concealed by a sign or a thing that is known." Something you recognize carrying a different, deeper meaning.
Incredibly, the examples it gives include a square — an emblem of morality — a plumb line, the symbol of rectitude, and the beehive as a symbol of industry. Yes, they do communicate to one another using symbols, as I have maintained from the very beginning.
By the way, Kash Patel continually stressing "33 hours" was not random. It did not feel subtle. It seemed to me and to many others that it was some sort of signaling. Thirty-three. Everyone was just saying 33 all the time.
Erika Kirk and the Plan to Raise Her Political Profile
So to the routinely gaslit public, I would like to validate your every instinct — most especially about the subsequent behavior of Turning Point USA as an organization. Behavior that looked to us as though it was diabolical. What did they give us? The horrific murder of a man followed by the joyful coronation of his wife, who is now inviting his enemies onto the very ship that he built.
I believe the ultimate goal was raising Erika's political profile as a potential presidential candidate down the line. That was explicitly and almost immediately floated by her dear friend and part-time homosexual deviant Tyler Bowyer — who she can't remember how she met. Take a listen to what he said a mere twelve days after Charlie's assassination.
Tyler Bowyer: I had conversations with Charlie about that. He was like, "Man, Erika could be so much bigger and better than me at almost everything." We'd laugh all the time about it — because people were like, "Charlie was going to be president someday." He believed firmly that Erika was going to be president someday.
Candace Owens: There it is again. Them telling us the private conversations were the exact opposite of everything Charlie was saying publicly. Women, get married, have children, have lots of children, stay home. That's more important. In the days leading up, Erika said she stayed back because Charlie said, "Home needs you." That's why she didn't go to the September 10th event. Charlie was every day telling people that family is the most important thing. But privately, when he sat down with Tyler Bowyer, he was apparently like, "Erika's going to be president. That's what I want for my wife."
And he wasn't the only one. Here is Frank Turk on October 7th, just three weeks following Charlie's assassination.
Frank Turk: I used to say to him, the ticket in 2028 is going to be Vance-Kirk. Between you and me and our listeners — I'm not giving up on the Vance-Kirk ticket.
I think Erika would be an amazing president someday.
Candace Owens: That, my friend, would be an example of what Father Ripinger described as diabolical psychology. Like: oh, Charlie was going to be president, but you know what? It was Vance-Kirk we were hoping for. But now he's gone — we don't have to let go of that hope, because there's still a Kirk. And here is Mikey McCoy echoing that sentiment.
Mikey McCoy: He left behind these blueprints for her — and for you.
I definitely thought maybe there would be a Vance-Kirk ticket. Maybe there still will be.
Candace Owens: Beautiful. Just beautiful. Who could deny this sort of destiny? Erika Kirk being the president in her husband's place, and they're smiling and laughing about that plausibility. And we're never going to see those blueprints, guys. But they did say to Mikey McCoy — my 21-year-old person who I have no idea how he even got the job of chief of staff — that these blueprints are for you. Not given responsibly to someone running the estate lawyers. No — left for Mikey because he would just understand them.
Erika Kirk Described as a Psychopath
With everything I have thus far uncovered about Erika, I do believe that was her ultimate goal: the White House. I think Elizabeth Lane read Erika correctly when she posited that she may be a psychopath. Because in my opinion, only a psychopath could — after her husband's public assassination — offer a raise to Dan Flood, the security guard who failed Charlie in every possible manner on September 10th. Only a psychopath who does not experience human emotions the way humans experience them would be capable of offering and then giving an in-home interview to the New York Times in the immediate days following her husband's assassination — the New York Times, a publication her husband hated — and then telling that journalist that the least traumatizing part was the idea of raising her children without a father.
A psychopath is the best answer I can come up with for why she felt compelled to go into the office the same week and bring her kids every day, rather than tending to their every emotional need at home as they come to the realization that they will never see their father again. A psychopath is my best explanation for why she told Jesse Watters that she had zero fear — none at all — the very next day, walking out the door with her kids in tow. I think nearly everyone in the world felt a little less safe in the days following Charlie's assassination. But not his wife, Erika Kirk.
Erika lies pathologically. And the media is trying to tell us that it's perfectly understandable — relatable even. Divine, actually. She lies because she's so godly. So godly that she forgave the person who allegedly murdered her husband before she even saw evidence of his guilt. And despite an overwhelming amount of evidence mounting to the contrary, Erika is so godly that she even helped validate the implausible parts of the narrative regarding Tyler Robinson — like the neck stopping a 30-odd-6 bullet. She came up with the Superman steel neck and all. No questions. Just faith. Deep faith, and lies. A lot of lies.
And whatever the attempt was with Erika — pay attention to me, media — it has failed categorically. Stop it. All of your little media spells are failing as of late, because we've recognized that they are very easily defeated by truth. Loud truth. And more and more people are daring to speak it, feeling inspired by Tucker Carlson to stand up and recognize what it is we are fighting. True evil. Old school, ancient evil.
Tim Dylan's Comedy Analysis of the Kirk Situation
We even have comedians that are daring to make jokes about the obvious. Tim Dylan, take a listen.
Tim Dylan: You look at the Kirk thing — tragic death on its face. We see a furry, the furry's boyfriend, the thing — okay. Then we zoom out. We go: wait, the wife's weird. Something up with the wife. The organization's weird. Something's up with them. Three weeks after the guy's dead, she's out there with sparklers. They're doing Cirque du Soleil. Something's off.
Now we find out the wife is — it's beyond weird. It's creepy. And there's a very good chance that this woman was his handler. He was this powerful young guy who raised a lot of money for a lot of people and took a lot of money from a lot of people, and money is never free. So how do you direct a guy like that who's incredibly important? He's running the largest young voter registration organization. He's handling large sums of money. He's out there sculpting narrative as it regards to domestic and foreign policy. So you have a handler who comes in, and she may have loved him — I'm sure she loved him. Why wouldn't a handler love her husband? Because even though she was his Mossad handler and probably had him killed, no marriage is perfect. None. Not one.
She may have been his handler, and they came to her one day and said, "He found out you're his handler." Or she might have told them. She might have said, "Listen, we got problems." And I'm not the only one saying this, by the way. This woman may have called someone up and said, "We got bad news. This guy found all the laundered money and now he knows I'm his handler." And they were like, "Can we do anything about it?" And she goes, "I don't know." And then they go, "Well, we might have to, you know..." I'm not saying any of that happened. I'm saying that's more reasonable than what we're being told. That's all. Nothing that we're being told is reasonable whatsoever. It doesn't make any sense.
Candace Owens: By the way, I noted from my producer that some of you on YouTube got cut off for the first four minutes of the show. Just to let you know — we were speaking about people who were having a meltdown on X because of Tucker Carlson's tweet. A very simple tweet. He said: "Pray the spell breaks and the world is saved." What I am positing is the reason they are so triggered is because of the word "spell," which implies witchcraft, which implies the occult. And that is what this is. That is the moment we are arriving in — we need to wake up to what it is that the people at the top believe.
Trump: The Longest-Running Joke
This brings me to President Trump, who has actually transformed into the longest-running joke. It didn't take Charlie Kirk's death for me to wake up to what he was very fast becoming and what he now is.
I have not exactly found the correct words to communicate how I feel about President Donald Trump. If you were a 2015, 2016 person running around in a MAGA hat, catching all the figurative bullets for supporting him, standing up to the Never Trumpers who are now running his administration — this level of deceit and betrayal should sicken you. The human spirit isn't really meant to contend with that sort of deceit.
You're not supposed to even fathom a scenario where someone like Charlie Kirk quite literally dedicates his entire professional career, builds up an organization meant to help Trump, to empower Trump and conservative principles — and in return, when Charlie Kirk is assassinated in front of the world, Trump dedicates a total of two, maybe three tweets to it. He never demanded an investigation. And one of those tweets is an AI image of Charlie hugging an Israeli flag.
Trump has shown more interest in debunking the mainstream media narrative about whether or not he's balding than he showed any interest in investigating who murdered a person who was supposed to be his dear friend.
Trump's Betrayals Catalogued
So how exactly are we supposed to process that? I think we are to simply understand that Trump has loyalty to no one but himself. It probably wasn't even anything that deep that they offered him. It was probably just: "Hey, we'll give you a piece of real estate in Gaza with your name on it. Favorable headlines in the New York Times every morning." Honestly, that's probably all it took for Trump to betray not just the legacy and memory of Charlie Kirk, but also his supporters — the very supporters who followed him into battle, some of whom literally spent time in prison after January 6th because they believed in him.
Trump has betrayed every last single one of us. Make no mistake about that. Trump is now an ever-Trumper — partnered with the very people we had to fight to get him into office, and insulting us. He thinks we're too stupid to notice that he promised low gas prices, promised no more forever wars, no more involvement in Middle East conflict — and we're now getting the exact opposite. That's happening because he's a coward. And that's going to be his legacy. A person who could not stand up to Bibi Netanyahu. A person who just loves money and loves the idea of his name on anything.
To recap his administration thus far: he has worked to allow the slow erosion of the First Amendment on college campuses — special carveouts for antisemitism, which are in effect hate speech laws. There is a new IHRA definition for antisemitism so broad that it includes, quote, "accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide than to the interest of their own nations."
That's interesting, because Trump himself rather hilariously violates his own standard when he discusses his donor Miriam Adelson. Take a listen to what he says.
Donald Trump: Miriam, stand up, please. She really is — I mean, she loves this country. Her and her husband are so incredible. We miss him so dearly. But I actually asked her — I'm going to get her in trouble with this — I actually asked her once: "So Miriam, I know you love Israel. What do you love more, the United States or Israel?" She refused to answer. That might mean Israel, I must say. We love you. Thank you, darling, for being here. That's a great honor.
Candace Owens: So Trump is saying that the person he took a hundred million — two hundred million dollars from in the end — loves Israel more than she loves America. She served in the IDF. That is what he is saying to you.
Trump's administration then delayed the release of the Epstein files and then gaslit us about it. He called the files a Democratic hoax. He asked us famously, "Are we still talking about the Epstein files?" Make no mistake — that translates into providing cover for Jeffrey Epstein, an occult Jewish pedophile.
Trump told us no more forever wars. They marketed themselves as pro-peace — him and Vance, that was the ticket they ran on. Until Bibi Netanyahu said Venezuela is antisemitic. Then we took out Maduro. And guess who benefited? Venezuela sent its first oil shipment to Israel in years. Americans, your gas prices are going up. But the important thing to remember is that your taxpaying dollars supported the military operation in Venezuela, which has thus far benefited Israel.
My best guess is that's at least part of the reason Trump is also obsessed with acquiring Greenland, because they do have untapped crude oil — an estimated 31 billion barrels worth. That sure would go a long way for Israel's incessant need to bomb and destroy.
And maybe you voted for Trump because you were a MAHA mom. Have no fear. On February 26th, Trump signed an executive order invoking the Defense Production Act to boost the production of glyphosate — the cancer-causing agent in weed killer that MAHA moms fought to eliminate. But here's the part that gets largely overlooked. The Washington Post noted: "The largely overshadowed part was the order's mention of the manufacturer of munitions used by the United States military. Bayer, which makes glyphosate, is also the only company in the United States that manufactures a form of elemental phosphorus — white phosphorus — which is used to make the weed killer."
White phosphorus is also used to make munitions deployed as smoke screens and incendiary devices that can violently burn property or people. And you're not going to believe me, but guess what is being used right now in Lebanon. "Israel unlawfully using white phosphorus." I wonder where they're getting that from. Probably from the pro-peace ticket.
The Bombing of Iran
Bibi instructed Trump to bomb Iran almost immediately. At first it was limited to hitting their nuclear sites. And I shouldn't even say "gratefully" because he promised us no involvement in overseas conflicts — but they at least pretended for a little while that it was going to be a limited operation. Some of us knew better, because it's never ending.
The obstacle of Charlie Kirk was subsequently removed, and now where are we? The United States is preemptively bombing Iran. The explanation we are receiving is: because Israel was going to bomb Iran, we went ahead and did it for them, just in case Iran responded by hitting American military bases. Marco Rubio came right out and said exactly that.
Marco Rubio: The assessment that was made was that if we stood and waited for that attack to come first before we hit them, we would suffer much higher casualties. And so the president made the very wise decision. We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces. And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties and perhaps even more killed. And then we would all be here answering questions about why we knew that and didn't act.
Candace Owens: I'm sorry, but under that scenario — if Israel was going to cause and set off that chain of events — wouldn't it have made more sense to stop Israel? Just don't understand how the logic is: Israel can't stop bombing people, so we have to bomb people for them. That's what he's telling you.
We just murdered 150 Iranian civilians — school girls between the ages of seven and twelve — preemptively. Because Israel was probably going to bomb them. So we went ahead and did that for them. So long as you say "preemptively," it makes it okay.
I will reiterate my perspective that Trump allowing this to happen makes him a traitor and also a coward, and you would do well to accept that fact. Stop playing left or right. Stop saying it would have been different if a Democrat was in office. These people occupy both sides. And I believe very much that world wars are in effect global resets. That's why they always want them. They use propaganda to convince people to sign up for their own slaughter.
Something that lives in my mind rent-free is Norman Finkelstein informing me that Israel had a literal and actual government policy known as "mowing the lawn" in Gaza, where the IDF would at random begin shooting and killing Palestinians to ensure the population didn't grow. And when I see everything going on right now — this insistence that we all have to get ready for Armageddon — this feels to me like an opportunity to simply mow the lawn of people who stand against them. Population control has always been the aim. Whether it's by vaccines, abortion propaganda — my body, my choice — left or right, it's the same end. They want you to agree to murder your offspring or yourselves.
A Draft Is Being Signaled
They are already signaling that they're keeping their options open regarding whether they will need boots on the ground. Here is Israel's Defense Minister Benny Gantz discussing whether that need can be excluded.
Benny Gantz: I would not exclude it — for those reasons or others. But we'll have to see how it goes forward. We've been waiting for 47 years, and we've come to a point where every necessary means should be taken in order to achieve our goals.
Candace Owens: I love that the follow-up question was: "Is that going to include Israeli boots on the ground?" It's implied that it's not Israeli boots on the ground and the follow-up is almost, "Oh okay, if you do it — are you going to also include Israeli boots on the ground?"
And in that same vein, Karoline Leavitt is signaling that a draft is not off the table.
Questioner: Mothers out there are worried that we're going to have a draft, that they're going to see their sons and daughters get involved in this. What do you want to say about the president's plans for troops on the ground?
Karoline Leavitt: It has been and it will continue to be an air campaign. And President Trump wisely does not remove options off of the table. I know a lot of politicians like to do that quickly, but the president as commander-in-chief wants to continue to assess the success of this military operation. It's not part of the current plan right now, but the president again wisely keeps his options on the table.
Candace Owens: He only allows Israel to do that. Only Israel is allowed to attack America. Only Israel is allowed to get away with the Lavon Affair. Only Israel is allowed to get away with what they did at the USS Liberty. That is a right reserved for Israel — to attack and use Americans. That's their birthright, probably promised to them 3,000 years ago.
The way that they're speaking, the way they keep pushing it — oh, it's just going to be Operation Midnight Hammer, that's it. Now suddenly, oh, we need to do a little bit more preemptively. Now, oh, the options are still maybe kind of on the table. That sounds to me like the question is not if, but when that option is going to be executed. I think it's actually a crucial part of their plan. It's time to mow the lawn. That's why Israel supporters like Bill Ackman went rabid over the weekend over me suggesting that maybe military men shouldn't sign up. Maybe you shouldn't sign up to join the American military if this is the circumstance we live in.
Bill was retweeting people stipulating that it's actually a federal crime to tell people not to sign up for the military. Why is that? Why does the idea of the Goyim not serving have them so stressed out? If it's so overwhelmingly popular — as every poll they release claims — Americans love Israel so much, they just love dead children in the Middle East — then prove it. Have at it without us.
In the meantime: no American son or daughter should die for Israel. Flat out. Goyim, stand down. Go home. Find the legal means to exit the military, because there are legal means you can exit. You can in fact conscientiously object to military service. Military men, in case you didn't know, swear an oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America. I don't really see that happening right now.
From his flagrant violations of free speech to freedom of religion — Trump recently fired Carrie Pryne Bowler from the religious committee because Zionists didn't like her Catholic perspectives — can anybody meaningfully point out which specific portion of the Constitution our commander-in-chief is currently doing a good job protecting? Show me which guaranteed constitutional right you believe Trump will not violate for Israel. Can you point to one? Because I feel like right now we are all being forced into the servitude of a foreign nation.
So by all means, allow the Mark Levins and the Ben Shapiros to sign their offspring up instead. Allow the Christian Zionists — the ones who make videos telling you how devilish it is if you don't support Israel. They believe this is messianic, that Bibi was sent to usher in Armageddon and that's going to bring Jesus back. I urge you, all of you Christian Zionists — sign up for the military today. Please, stop tweeting, stop screaming about Tucker Carlson. You have something much more important to do. There is a messianic mission right now. Go to Iran. Go remove the thousands of dead innocent Palestinian children from beneath the rubble in Gaza so that Trump can build his hotel. Be the change you wish to see in the world. You can do this without us.
Comments From Viewers
Candace Owens: All right, we're going to get to some of your comments. Stevie wrote: "Erika was telling the truth about being at a job interview. It's just that Charlie was the job." Yes. We will have more on that for you guys tomorrow as we get into her Charlie years.
Laura Evelyn writes: "Calling yourself a sole provider when you are sitting on tens of millions of dollars that you didn't earn is a bold strategy." There is no strategy like she's basically on autopilot.
And I just have no words for everything we have seen transpire. What I hope you take away from this episode is that this is gaslighting on a scale so epic that I asked my husband meaningfully this weekend — we went to get something to eat — and I just said, "How much more are they going to twist the fabric of reality?" I've never seen anything like it. Releasing bots, fake people on the internet, to pretend this is all being supported, that people just love war. It's just made up. We all know they're lying. They know that we know they're lying. That's why they're angry. If they were actually winning, they wouldn't be angry.
The power that Israel had over America did not exist in the money alone. It didn't exist only in the blackmail — whatever they have on Lindsey Graham, I imagine it's so far beyond — manic in his support of Israel. But that wasn't the real power Israel held. The power was in the illusion. The power was in the millions of Americans — the majority of us — thinking and believing that Israel was innocent, believing that Israel was just a tiny country in the Middle East that had never done anything to anybody. And then they bet all that. They said: now we've got money, we control the troops, we've got the military, we've got the presidency, all this stuff. So now we're just going to go mask down.
No — you needed your mask up. And this is why they're angry. They recognize entire generations no longer believe them. Nobody believes in the innocence of Israel anymore. People are looking up and understanding how much they have been lied to. Pulling their kids out of school so they don't suffer the same ignorance we suffered for a very long time. I'm speaking especially to millennials.
Curious Joel writes: "JFK and Charlie Kirk's assassinations were examples of domestic regime change. I include CK because Turning Point USA was a military organization operating on behalf of the United States. Maybe we wouldn't be so fond of regime change wars if we fully knew that it happened to us too." I mean, when they sent me that cease and desist for saying that Turning Point was militarily infiltrated — everybody in the organization seems to have a military background. The pastors in Turning Point Faith. Erika's mother. It just seems like a lot of military people arrived very quickly. Sorry for noticing.
TJ Kurt writes: "Thank you for highlighting the fact that many of us gave thousands of dollars through GiveSendGo so that Erika could stay at home with her babies. While I'm still waiting for my thank you note, she says it's not enough and she will still need to work to support them. It is maximum ingratitude." Yeah, it is maximum ingratitude. And I could go on and on about how much money was given to her — someone even pointed out that I missed that Elon Musk donated. There is no reason Erika needs to be at the office every day. She did not need to become the CEO. She's not honoring her husband. It is impossible to be the sole parent and for those kids to grow up with the influence they need when you're busy being CEO and chairman of an alleged now-billion-dollar company. You really can't just be a single mom and somehow run an organization and say, "My children are happy because they're at the office." This is exactly where toddlers love to be.
Intuition Jen writes: "Candace, great job. Kabbalah, Satanism — there are many commonalities." Yes, there is indeed. They are attempting to bring their messiah back. We are looking at the synagogue of Satan. There's no question. Look at the amount of blood sacrifice this requires. You have to learn about Frankism. You have to learn about Jacob Frank — this movement of people, similar to the Christian Zionists, following a mentally disturbed psychopath who they thought was a messiah. That's what I see when I look at people who unflinchingly follow Bibi Netanyahu — who can look at what happened in Gaza and say this was by God's design. What God requires the sacrifice of children in that manner? Least of all for a hotel. These pastors have already been promised property in Gaza to convince their churches to support this. Just so you know.
Dshaw writes: "Look into the Hellfire Club if you have not already." I have. The Hellfire Club — that actually relates to France in one sense, but I believe it was in England. Either an Oxford or Cambridge club. I'm aware of it.
Dr. Tom Najar writes: "I want your honest opinion. How do you feel about rooting for Trump during the elections? Do you feel some responsibility for the chaos we are in?" Even the way you're setting up this question implies the other option would have been better. You had two options. You had Kamala — who absolutely nobody voted for. Biden couldn't even form a sentence. It is the same apparatus that was running the White House when Biden was in office that would have continued running it had Kamala won, and that is running it now with Trump. That's the way I see things.
Has Trump grown almost erratic in the manner in which he is gaslighting us? Yes. I definitely did not foresee that Epstein moment coming. I spent time explaining to people that Kamala was not who she said she was. I did the Kamala Chronicles. But I've been off the hardcore MAGA train for a while, actually. The thing that lets me down the most — that has been so shocking — is that he survived the assassination attempt, and what he is dedicating the rest of his time to is destroying America for Israel. You survived multiple assassination attempts and your instinct is to do more for Israel? I can't even comprehend what is going on. And it sucks. Absolutely sucks. A lot of people right now feel completely duped. Completely.
But if there's one thing I'm grateful for, it's that the left and the right are coming to this understanding together. They always pretend it's an either-or. It's not. We lose every single time. They have found different ways to constantly move us toward handing more power over to them. It's just how they argue to get us there.
Mama C writes: "During Charlie's memorial, my husband saw Tyler Bowyer and said we need to remember that guy. Turning Point has emotionally manipulated too many into thinking that these are decent, God-fearing people when it's clear that they are not." I have it on very good authority that they have had to cancel events that Erika was intended to speak at because there has been a backlash. There should be a backlash when you are not being told the truth. And you least of all should welcome this emotional manipulation — the idea that you have to accept the lies being told because her husband was Charlie Kirk.
Amy loves music writes: "Charlie was one of the reasons that I voted for Trump. Do I think that he was better than Kamala? Yes. But an independent artist named Ren called it choosing between calamities. God bless you, Candace. Stay safe. But if Erika and Vance have a ticket, they won't get my vote." I think anything that Erika is on or involved in — unless she does a mask-down, no-holds-barred, tell-the-truth interview, puts Charlie's phone on the table, and maybe stops saying Shabbat shalom — the chances of her doing anything in the future in politics are effectively zero percent.
Lastly, Ahmed writes: "Awesome work, Candace. Thank you for speaking truth."