Exclusive footage analysis: Did someone return to the Losee rooftop after the alleged Thomas Crooks shooting?
Candace Owens presents footage she claims shows an unidentified tall individual returning to the Losee rooftop after the alleged September 10th shooting of Charlie Kirk, and separately covers the Brian Cole Jr. pipe bomb case.
Summary
Candace Owens presents two parallel cases she argues share a common thread: footage that complicates official narratives and what she describes as the targeting of individuals — one autistic — to serve as convenient suspects. In the Brian Cole Jr. pipe bomb case, she details investigative journalist Steve Baker's findings that Cole appears on camera in two separate locations simultaneously on January 5th, 2021, along with identifying details including a grandmother-confirmed Christmas jacket with its tag still attached and a handmade Washington Redskins face mask made by his mother. On the Tyler Robinson case, Owens presents what she describes as exclusive UVU security footage showing a very tall individual — whom she nicknames "Slenderman" — returning to the Losee rooftop ledge approximately 12–13 minutes after the alleged shooter jumped off at 12:23 p.m., lingering there for several minutes before departing at approximately 12:42 — just before Officer Bagley arrived at 12:44 and found the screwdriver. She argues this footage, combined with Officer Bagley's testimony that he never checked whether anyone had been on the rooftop between the shooter's departure and his own arrival (a gap of approximately 20 minutes), suggests the screwdriver may have been planted. She also addresses her firing from the Daily Wire, Kimberly Guilfoyle's removal as ambassador to Greece, and responds to comments from viewers.
Key Takeaways
FULL TRANSCRIPT
Opening remarks and viewer comment
Candace Owens: Happy Tuesday. Just three more shows before maternity leave. I'm not crying, you're crying.
First, I would like to shout out one of you geniuses from the comment section. Honestly, the comment section is becoming my favorite place to late-night doom scroll. The ideas that you guys come up with — this time regarding how we might help catch those pesky gang bangers over at TPUSA. This user wrote: "I have an idea for Turning Point regarding the vandalism of the CK statue. It just came to me as I was sitting here listening to the show. Call Nick Shirley. This dude can infiltrate any gang and we should know who did it within 48 hours."
Positively genius. There's something strange in the neighborhood. Who you going to call? Nick Shirley. Remember, it took 48 hours for him to just bust into the favela of Brazil — the gangsters. Someone get this case over to him and we should expect results. Thank you for that.
Brian Cole Jr. and the January 6th pipe bomb case
But for today's episode, we have a tale of two paths — maybe even three. Brian Cole Jr. That has been making the rounds. That is the Black autistic young man that it would appear Kash Patel and Dan Bongino decided to just blame for the pipe bombs. January 5th — the evening before January 6th — somebody dropped off pipe bombs. Remember that? Well, the details now being revealed suggest the feds might not be telling the whole truth. As usual, we all have a sense that the feds might even be intentionally targeting autistic teenagers and adults to blame for their own crimes. And Brian Cole Jr. might just be able to prove that.
What do Tyler Robinson and Brian Cole Jr. have in common? Footage that deeply complicates the official narrative. And we've got some to reveal to you regarding Tyler Robinson's alleged actions on September 10th. It's rather explosive.
Welcome back to Candace. If all else fails, blame someone with autism. I'm wondering when exactly that became the official state policy, because I think that is what has been going on — potentially for decades, actually, when I revisit it. There is kind of this common denominator.
We had mentioned to you guys also this bizarre Scripps Media coincidence — in the matter of Tyler Robinson and also in the matter of Brian Cole Jr., the alleged DC pipe bomber. Just as independent journalist Steve Baker began closing in on the true suspect, who he believed dropped the pipe bombs — who he identified as a woman, and who he also determined may have been a Capitol Police officer — just as independent journalists went, "Wait a second, I think this might have been an inside job and the feds were responsible for January 6th" — Kash Patel and the gang swooped in. This was last November, December. And they said, "We got him. We got him." Okay, this time it took them more than 33 hours. But man, they are so glad that they can now reveal to you all that it was this 30-year-old Black autistic man who's never been in trouble, but decided as his first crime that he would attempt to blow up the RNC and the DNC on the evening of January 6th.
What luck for the feds. Like I said, right when the public begins to notice that the facts are not lining up, they say, "Oh no, this isn't an inside job. We got them." And in walks Scripps Media, instantly providing the public with footage that they happen to have on hand of what is, before then, a totally unknown suspect to the world. They're like, "Look, here he is. By the way, here's an obscure traffic stop from years ago, which should have been automatically deleted, but we have it. And here he is." I thought that part was extremely odd and coincidental.
Then one of you guys sent me over a tip and reminded me that the original American patsy — of course, Lee Harvey Oswald — when the public began having questions about his involvement, whether he really shot JFK, our CIA engaged in Operation Mockingbird. They wanted to convince the public that he was the guy and that any questions surrounding the narrative regarding who killed JFK should not be asked. Don't ask any questions — that makes you a conspiracy theorist. In fact, that's when they began really using the term "conspiracy theorist." And they put American journalists on payroll to repeat their talking points as part of that operation.
Almost exactly like what we're seeing today. This feels like the DoD is putting people on payroll to repeat things that make no sense, telling us not to believe our own eyes. They've all kind of become these little mockingbirds. The evidence is overwhelming, just echoing everywhere.
When it was revealed by journalist Carl Bernstein which publications were working on behalf of the CIA, Scripps Media was on the list. It was Howard Scripps, and he named them explicitly. He didn't get into much detail about what they were doing, but these were among the mockingbirds. And it makes you really wonder if that alleged relationship ever ended, because I just find it strange that we're holding on to these mundane traffic stops.
Steve Baker's investigation: two Brian Cole Jr.s at 7:57 p.m.
Now, regarding Brian Cole Jr. — in case you missed this — Steve Baker and his team went through hours and hours of publicly released CCTV footage from January 5th, which is the night that he allegedly dropped off the pipe bombs at the RNC and the DNC. And guess what they discovered? They discovered two Brian Coles at 7:57 p.m. They discovered that Brian was on camera across town — the real Brian, if you would — at the exact same time that the pipe bomb suspect was on camera elsewhere. This is not possible unless Brian Cole Jr. is a literal X-Man who can divide into two separate human beings and be in two places at the same time. This is potentially exculpatory evidence.
Let me just say the evidence that they presented is pretty damning. They were able to identify some details — first and foremost pertaining to what he was wearing. Brian Cole — and I would say this is likely a symptom of his autism, because we know that a lot of people who are autistic will walk on their toes — he had on some shoes, and they were able to uniquely identify the shoes, as well as a jacket that he was wearing that still had tags on it from Christmas. Take a listen.
"If you look at the right heel of the individual walking — the rear heel right now, that is enlarged — right, they don't walk. This person does not walk with their heel inside their shoe. These are the shoes that we believe he's wearing right there that you're seeing in that shot, because these shoes were retired immediately after, because his mother had just bought him his first pair of Crocs. The jacket that's hanging there to the right is not the jacket that he's wearing in this video from five and a half years ago. This is a jacket I found in his room that still has a tag hanging on it."
"Let me tell you why that jacket especially is so significant."
When they discovered this detail, Brian Cole's grandmother reached out and said, "Yes, that is my grandson." And as proof of that, the jacket he is wearing is the Kohl's jacket that she purchased for him for Christmas just a few weeks earlier.
Look at this tweet from Steve Baker. He shared this information on X. He wrote: "Brian Cole Jr.'s grandmother just phoned me saying that the jacket that her grandson was wearing in this video is the exact jacket that she had given him for Christmas only two weeks prior. That explains why the tag is still hanging from the jacket. The FBI should be able to get that purchase record from Kohl's immediately. Loretta recalls making that purchase along with other gifts using her Kohl's credit card. There you go, Director Kash. I just made it easy for the FBI to do their job. Release Brian Cole Jr. now."
Yeah, that's going to be a tough one to get over. A jacket that still has a tag on it, and she's saying she purchased it using her Kohl's card. Release Brian Cole now.
And by the way, that's not all. He's also wearing a custom face mask. Take a listen.
"The mask itself — now, anybody can zoom in on this like we've done. We spent hours zooming in on every frame of this sequence of videos. But this mask is the maroon and gold of the old Washington Redskins. Now, the timing of this particular video was in January of 2021, and no longer were they the Redskins, but they had not become the Washington Commanders yet. They were just the Washington Football Team. But here's what's most significant about the mask: Brian's mother handmade all of his masks for him. He didn't like wearing the surgical mask. He didn't like the way they felt. He liked the cloth feel. She would buy the team colors and make masks for him, family members, friends. She did so not only early on, which was back when they were still just in the netherworld of a team mascot name — they were just the Washington Football Team for two years — but then once they became the Commanders, she made masks using Commander logo patterns. So this predated those patterns. And this is emblematic of the work that she did. I hope that Brian Senior will forgive me for what I said. When he saw this — I will tell you that when Brian's mother saw that mask, she started crying."
"And once you blow it up, the colors are evident. It's not incredible, but again we're dealing with pixelated cameras. But more importantly, we see Brian's face."
They even go further and do a height analysis. It's worth following the work of Steve Baker. He was completely gaslit when he came forward with this, when he identified the female that he believed dropped off the pipe bombs. And of course, like I said, Kash Patel and the gang got around and said, "Never mind. Don't look anywhere. It's never the state's fault. We actually have this autistic young man that we can stick this on."
As we demonstrated to you guys in an earlier episode, they put him through hell. They effectively forced him to give a false testimony because he was being tortured. You would think the FBI would immediately address this. I think it's going to be really hard for the FBI to get around these details. You can't be in two places at once. This is going to be a problem for them that needs solving.
No comment yet from Kash Patel. Dan Bongino has gone on a blocking spree online, and Brian Cole is still in prison — much like Tyler Robinson, who I have asserted very many times that I do not believe was ever on the Losee rooftop on September 10th, for a variety of reasons — like the athletic nature of the person moving, the military crawl, jumping off of a rooftop. Tyler Robinson is not known to be an athlete. Who would jump off a rooftop unflinchingly, without pausing? But there's more.
Exclusive footage: "Slenderman" returns to the Losee rooftop
I'm going to share with you more as to why I do not believe that Tyler Robinson was ever on that rooftop. First, I want to jog your memory to a rather unbelievable moment of the preliminary hearing — and I mean I literally didn't believe it. It was when Officer Bagley was being questioned by Kathy Nester, Tyler Robinson's lawyer. She wanted to know if he had checked the cameras at UVU to see if anyone had been on the Losee rooftop after the alleged shot and before Officer Bagley went up there. She wanted to know: did anybody go up onto the Losee rooftop in the approximate 20 minutes between when the suspect jumped off the rooftop at 12:23 p.m. and when Officer Bagley arrived onto the rooftop at 12:44 p.m.?
Officer Bagley, after pretending he doesn't really comprehend the question, eventually answers with this. Take a listen.
"You didn't — did you look on the video to see that entire — okay, that's what I'm asking. So you did not review the video to see if there was someone between you — that individual jumping off and you coming on — if anybody had been on or disturbed that scene in any way. Okay."
Really? Really, Officer Bagley? No one checked the cameras to see if someone went onto the Losee rooftop before you got on that rooftop and after 12:23? That's just not something that interested you on that day? You had this instinct to run up — maybe it came from Losee — and then that's it. You just weren't interested beyond that. Not on that day, or any other day thereafter, leading up to this preliminary hearing of basically a whole year. You never said, "Hey, maybe we as the police should check the footage and see if somebody else came up there."
I'm not exactly a buyer of that narrative. In fact, it's a narrative that glows to me. What I mean by that is: by saying something so unbelievable, it almost signals to the public that the opposite thing must be true. You have an officer who is claiming that he just wasn't interested beyond getting up there, and for whatever reason, inexplicably, we know that his body cam footage was not working. He finds this crucial evidence and then he just — he lost interest. Nah, I don't buy it.
Nonetheless, let's assume that he told the truth. And then instead, I am the person that has to help him. I am the person that must oblige Officer Bagley's extreme oversight — and I would call it an extreme oversight. I can exclusively confirm here on this show that yes, someone did indeed go back up onto the Losee rooftop to the ledge afterward. And in my every assessment, it appears to me to be the very same individual who had jumped onto the rooftop and then jumped off of the rooftop — the alleged shooter on the rooftop — almost like he forgot something, or perhaps he forgot to leave something.
So I'm going to first show you, side by side, the two individuals — I believe the same individual. This is just a still frame, because I think it's important before I show you the actual footage to show you the side by side. 12:17 on your left. 12:37 — after the alleged rooftop shot — on the right. Nearly identical. We took a look at the pixels. We took a look at the height. And I'm going to show you this footage. If I didn't tell you that these were taken 20 minutes apart, you would think it was part of the same footage. On the left, that is just before he's going to jump down. On the right, at approximately 12:37, approximately five minutes before Officer Bagley is going to get up there. That's 20 minutes later. And this person, who I believe returned to the exact spot, actually lingers there for about five minutes. He's just going to linger there. And then Officer Bagley is going to come up and he's going to find the screwdriver.
I'm going to walk you through what he does. I'm going to show you the footage because it's that unbelievable.
Why do I believe this is the very same person that was just on the rooftop? Aside from that nearly identical build, the height, and the placement 20 minutes apart — it's so identical that I feel like I have to show you the footage so that you know that I'm not lying. And I'm going to give him a nickname as well. We have nicknamed him Slenderman, because he is extremely tall, which I'm going to also demonstrate to you.
So I want to first show you this person — Slenderman — who we believe is the same individual that jumped off the Losee rooftop at 12:35 p.m. This is 12 minutes after Charlie is hit. I want you to watch this. And don't worry, we're going to point that person out for you. Here he is. You can just see how tall his legs are. You can see the backpack. And yeah, we're going to talk about the dragging of that leg that you slightly see there.
Next up, at approximately 12:36, he is going to walk up to the ledge — the ledge that we know the so-called Tyler Robinson shooter hopped over and ducked down behind, where we're supposed to imagine he was putting together a gun. And he's just going to ponder there. I don't know why. Take a look. How curious. Again, this is after Charlie is hit. We have tracked him. He's there. Maybe he's texting. Maybe he's waiting for a signal. Who knows?
But what we can tell you happens next is that he sort of walks back and forth around 12:38. Take a look at this. He's there for a while. You are again going to observe his height. This is a very tall person.
And then miraculously — miraculously — once again, the footage is going to have a dropout. Because what we know happens is he goes back to the ledge at 12:40. He's standing over it again, and then the footage just blacks out for a minute. What he does at that ledge is anybody's guess. Why is it blacked out? Nobody knows. But what we do have is footage of him then departing the ledge at 12:42 p.m. You'll note we are just a couple of minutes from when Officer Bagley is now going to appear on the Losee rooftop. Take a look at Slenderman walking away from the ledge. Look at that leg suddenly being dragged again. Maybe he got injured jumping off of a rooftop.
And I think we all know what happens next. Literally less than a minute later, Officer Bagley makes his premiere on the rooftop. And the first thing he does is he finds a screwdriver just a few feet over the ledge. Take a listen to Officer Bagley's testimony about where he found that screwdriver.
"Officer Bagley, so you testified that this is the screwdriver as you saw it on September 10th, 2025, correct?"
"Yes."
"And this was on top of which roof?"
"The lawyer building."
"And in relationship to the entrance, the stairway, and when you hopped over the rail to get there, where was it located?"
"About 10 or 15 feet in."
Oh, that's really interesting.
Now, I want to be clear — this is now veering into my opinion, and I have a developed opinion on the basis of even more footage that I have. But I do want to make clear: this is not a fact. It's an opinion.
I think Officer Bagley and the authorities — and even Kathy Nester, because people weren't sure why she was asking that very specific question — knew that that individual was up in that most critical area following Charlie getting hit. Officer Bagley pretending that he was just not interested in discovering the details regarding whether or not anyone was up there before him leads me to believe that my eyes are not deceiving me, and that this is indeed the same person who ran across the rooftop and jumped down.
Otherwise, you would just state the obvious. The obvious would be: "Of course we checked the footage, and yes, we did discover someone up there. We don't think it's relevant because blah blah blah." Right? Of course you check the footage, because you were looking for a killer that was on the loose. Of course you would have wanted to see if anybody was up there. Maybe somebody joined him after. Maybe he ran a different route. Of course you check the immediate before and after. It is nonsense to assert otherwise. And yet, the absence of that assertion gratefully provides, as I described earlier, a glow. It means they wanted the public to go, "I don't know, I don't know."
What I think — in my opinion — is that Slenderman is returning to the scene of the non-crime, because I do not believe Charlie was shot from the Losee rooftop. And the only reason I could think of that an individual would do that — that any person would immediately return to the scene of the crime — is because he forgot something. Something that was a very big deal to have forgotten. It is my opinion that they made a major mistake. He who jumped off the roof made a major critical error. You either left something, or forgot to leave something. That's what I conclude.
Because it appears to me that someone with a lot of power at the university — potentially — and with access to the footage, thought it prudent to wipe that approximate minute after Slenderman reappears at the ledge. It's got me thinking that it's plausible that that deleted minute might feature a screwdriver being tossed. Remember, the screwdriver is the only thing that has tied Tyler Robinson to the rooftop. And I'm thinking that Slenderman made a loop because they realized, "Oh, we forgot to drop the screwdriver."
Again, that's my speculation based on the footage that I'm looking at, and who I believe to be the exact same person, based on the absence of the obvious statement that should have been made by Officer Bagley — my view being that yes, of course, we checked the footage and we know for a fact that someone was up there, looking around, curiously lingering, and then footage just sort of cuts out at exactly the right time. And then all of a sudden, Officer Bagley's got the inkling and he goes right there, and the first thing he does is say, "I found a screwdriver." But unfortunately, his Axon body cam footage wasn't working. Because if that footage gets found and somebody tossed a screwdriver and then he finds it immediately after, exactly in that spot — it could look like they were setting up a patsy.
Again, this is my opinion. It's not a fact. But the footage is factual. Your eyes are factual. You can look at that side by side. You can look at that individual and you can think — while it's still legal — about why his Axon body cam would unusually cut out, why the UVU camera system would unusually cut out, and why it seems that everything is point-blank unusual when it comes to the Charlie Kirk assassination. Nothing makes sense. Probably because Tyler Robinson didn't shoot Charlie from the Losee rooftop. Again, that's my opinion.
Gaslighting, the Daily Wire firing, and Jeremy Boring
You know, all of these people — I return to this idea of the audacity of the gaslight. That's kind of what's been going on. That's what everybody in the world is waking up to. What kind of rare psychopaths are these? They do harm and then they gaslight us about the harm that they are doing. And you just go: what has been rinsed out of your humanity that you're capable of that?
I'm actually not capable of lying at that level. That doesn't feel good — to tell a lie to harm people and then to lie about the harm that you've caused. And I go back to in our book club — two books that will transform your life — The Assault on Truth, to understand the Kabbalah tradition of what Sigmund Freud did when he knew kids were being harmed and abused, and he developed psychoanalysis to then gaslight the children into believing, "No, you're actually attracted to your parents." It's so psychotic and it's so evil, and it's real. The Assault on Truth will blow your mind that that is what he did. And they've popularized that throughout America — they've popularized gaslighting people after they do something to them.
And there was no greater example of that. By the way, I had a little back-and-forth tiff. This has been going on for three years. This is just like permanent background noise in my life — this former CEO of the Daily Wire, Jeremy Boring, who is just never going to stop involving himself in my life over a fake podcast. But it's so stunning to me that he fired me and is now trying to gaslight people about the reasons that he fired me, because I said genocide is always wrong.
So of course, nobody was talking about him. No one was doing anything to him. He just sees somebody saying, "I like Candace," and he goes crazy. This was the tweet correspondence where he then tried to extend the gaslight to one of the people that follows me.
Kelly Fuller wrote: "At this point, I only trust three people: Candace Owens, Ian Carroll, and Baron Coleman." Okay, that's her prerogative. Now, when he's around, he writes: "Tragic." Then she says: "Tragic is firing someone for saying genocide is always wrong." Jeremy Boring comes back and he says: "I wonder if you're being deliberately misleading or if you are truly brainwashed." He's now telling her that she's brainwashed and being misleading. And he says: "I understand, because Candace is better at lying than most people are at discerning the truth." He is treating her like an abused child and going, "I understand why you think that that happened, but it didn't happen." It's the audacity of the gaslight.
So I call my lawyers and I'm like, there's no way he's allowed to do this. I know that we have confidentiality clauses, but you can't violate the clause by lying publicly about what happened to me. What my family and I lived through was extraordinary. It was extraordinary — and what we continue to live through, the stalking through the court systems, everything.
So I actually was allowed — I'm allowed to reply in a limited way, because we even have a clause for if someone violates the confidentiality, that you can only respond proportionately. Meaning he specifically is discussing the genocide portion, so I'm only allowed to reply regarding that. I wish I could drop my firing docs in their entirety. I encourage them to do that. You guys would think me a saint, actually.
But I wanted to show you that document so that we can put this to bed. The audacity of this gaslight. This is literally from my firing document. They put the tweet in there. So you just have to consider how sick this man is, that he is trying to tell her that she's brainwashed when he himself inserted this in my firing docs. It says: "You have insinuated that you believe Israel is committing a genocide and refused to explicitly deny that interpretation." Meaning someone else interpreted it that way, and it was incumbent upon me to combat their interpretation.
But what did I actually tweet? I said: "No government anywhere has a right to commit a genocide ever. There's no justification for a genocide. I can't believe it even needs to be said or is even considered the least bit controversial to state." And ironically, that was in reference to Brian Mast and statements that he made that journalist Yashar Ali called out and said, "This is genocidal language" — where Mast said, "There's no such thing as an innocent Palestinian life." It was crazy. Totally crazy that he would say that. And it became a whole thing, and they tried to convince me that the tweet in and of itself was anti-Semitic.
The firing document goes on: "Instead of reporting the details of October 7th, 2024, the terrorist attacks against Israel, you have repeatedly posted about Christians being killed by Israel, and you recognize that this has led some to conclude that you are anti-Semitic." These are part of the reasons that I was fired from the Daily Wire. All of the reasons are within the same theme.
And I genuinely want it all to be released, because I think it really demonstrates what we have covered again on repeat on this show — the audacity of the gaslight. How insane you have to be to know that you explicitly put the tweet in my firing docs, among a great many other totally deranged things, and years later you're still pretending that I'm crazy. He called me the mistress of lies — as he's lying to the public. That lie exists no longer. The more he lies about the reasons that I was fired, the more rope that I will get to potentially share more. I hope that happens, because it's been long enough. And this is just becoming a sadistic pursuit in my honest opinion.
Kimberly Guilfoyle and the ambassadorship
Anyway, moving on from that — I did want to get to Kimberly Guilfoyle, because she's been making the news. People are concerned that she has a MAGA burn book, and I do feel like she is being made the patsy of the Trump administration.
What I mean by that is: after her and Don Jr. broke up, it was understood that she was given an ambassadorship to Greece because Don Jr. wanted her as far as possible — allegedly — from him and his new relationship. Now, Kimberly Guilfoyle has been pushed out as the ambassador. It was reported by Axios, and obviously everyone — it's been all over. She had to announce her resignation after the White House basically asked her to sit down following reports that she was not conducting herself in the best way. That's putting it lightly. She had a diplomatic posting. They said she was abusing the office, that she was making deals, that she was seeking financial favors to promote people's business interests. One person explicitly came out and said that she wanted $100,000 from him — she wanted him to pay off her credit card bill before her Senate confirmation hearing, and offered him access to the Trump administration.
So it looks really bad what Kimberly was doing. And by the way, it is bad — if that's what she was doing. And I do believe that she was doing it, because everyone else is doing it. Miriam Adelson outright purchased the White House, and now all of a sudden it's like, "Kim bad." Kim actually has been the most consistent. They're talking about her sex capades — we already knew that about Kim. Kim hasn't switched up. Everyone else in the administration has switched up. You gave her a post because your son wanted her gone, and she went out there and she maintained who she's always been — and I would say did it in a much more minor fashion than the rest of the Trump administration.
Look at what the Trump brothers are doing with the crypto scams. Why are we suddenly focusing on Kimberly Guilfoyle and her Amex card? It feels small. It feels like when they went after Karoline Leavitt for lying about her resume. Does it really matter that Karoline Leavitt lied about her resume? Why are we coming down suddenly on these two individuals when everyone's been doing this? Everyone's been stealing from American taxpayers and voters and making deals to enrich themselves, to enrich their families.
So I am just objectively Team Kimberly Guilfoyle. I want to say that, because I look at basically what everybody else in this family has done to abuse the office, to abuse what's around the office, the deals that they have made. I look at what's going on in Palestine. And I think Kimberly Guilfoyle — she wanted her Amex paid off. At least she did it in another country. The Trump family has done corruption at a level that is so shocking. It's also embarrassing for me as someone who believed that when they got in there, we were fighting the concept of this level of corruption. This is why we didn't vote for Hillary Clinton. Seeing what Trump 2.0 has become — it's sickening. It's the reason why they are panicking about the midterms.
He has betrayed everyone, including Charlie Kirk. So I'm not a fan of the Kimberly Guilfoyle MAGA-patsy situation. Frankly, I think they should pay her off. I think they should cut her in on the crypto scams. I think she deserves to have a Trump trust, for whatever that is worth. Keep it consistent, because she certainly has.
Viewer comments and closing
All right, you guys. Top comments from yesterday's episode regarding the gang bangers and Tyler Bowyer asserting that, hey, we can't do anything else — they're wearing a mask and the license plate was covered.
Stacy writes: "Doesn't Tyler Bowyer know we only need to see the shoes to solve cases these days? So true. If he was wearing Converses, then we know it's Tyler Robinson. Just show us the group of people. Call Nick Shirley." I feel like you guys should release more footage instead. Tyler Bowyer is blocking more people on X. I am very disappointed.
Meaning Heels writes: "End-of-pregnancy Candace is my favorite kind of Candace." I do get a little testy. I am a little testy right now. I just don't have time for the lies, the BS, the gaslighting. We just need it to stop. It's just noise at this point.
New writes: "Hi Candace. I'm sending love from Saudi Arabia. It's my sister Sarah Aziz's birthday today. We are both huge fans of yours. Could you please wish her a happy birthday? It would absolutely make her day." Sarah Aziz, happy birthday. Wow — all the way from Saudi Arabia. I have not been there. I know Tucker Carlson has been there. I was actually invited to speak there for a conference last year, but I didn't go. Anyways, Sarah, happy birthday. I will definitely make it out there at some point — when Israel stops bombing everything and causing friction, perhaps when I feel like it's a safer time to go. Because I know you guys are definitely going through it right now because of what's going on.
Kiwi Kell writes: "I believe in the power of prayer. I take care of my disabled vet dad with dementia. I'm having scans on Thursday to see if my cancer is back. I trust in the Lord with all my heart. I would appreciate your prayers. Prayers for Candace and her family. Christ is king." Yes — I'm going to go with Kelly in my prayers, because I do actually like to make sure that if I say I'm going to pray, I do it. And we will pray for you.
Ali writes: "I don't know if you realize this, but you already won. You ruined the Zionist plan to hijack Charlie's legacy. You exposed the grifting vultures who now run Turning Point USA. The Latvian bot farms failed to conceal Erika's lies and betrayals. You literally have nothing left to prove." In some ways I do know that. That's the reason why they come after us non-stop, and it's the reason for fighting me through lawfare. It's all meant to exhaust me. But people say, "What do you want? Do you want them to admit?" Well, I don't want them to kill a person who didn't do it. That feels like a significant thing. Like, we already watched one innocent man be executed by the state — Charlie Kirk — and now these people are so despicable and vindictive that they're going to execute another potentially innocent person for the crime of what they did. You can't not see these cases through. What does it signal if we just go, "Okay, well, we're going to put our hands up — we all know it's the truth, but yeah, kill Tyler Robinson. At least we know what's true." No. We can't allow that to happen. It's why the Brian Cole Jr. case matters so much, and it's why this case matters so much.
And then there's just the spiritual pull. I feel like I will know spiritually when to let this go, and I can't. It's so disturbing to me what they did to Charlie, how they surrounded him, the Truman Show that surrounded him. And yeah, they're vultures. We continue to learn more about the state of affairs. If I didn't keep going, we wouldn't have discovered that Latvian bot farm and wouldn't have been able to put the pieces together — from the "I want to go home" and all the people that are involved. And then there's the larger picture of the global human trafficking and the Epstein class that's behind this, and waking people up to the fact that we need to pull our kids out of schools, out of these systems. Because I believe that's what Charlie said no to. That's my opinion.
Brooke writes: "Candace, you are glowing. I can't believe you're about to go on maternity leave. It's going to feel like forever. I'm sending so much love and blessings from me and the rest of Houston. Jesus is king. Go Max." We have certainly been going Max. I know. I can't believe I'm about to go on maternity leave. It's probably for the better, to be honest, because my patience is just not existent right now, and that's not good for anybody.
Earl's Daughter writes: "I had a conversation with some moms years ago. One said her son was diagnosed with Asperger's. She took the results to his pediatrician, who said the best thing she could do is never put it in his medical records. The doc said it would put a target on his back." Wow. That is mind-blowing. And I have to say I totally believe it — that it would put a target on his back. It's very sinister. And again, that is just another thread of this larger tapestry that we're all waking up to — of how the government has been functioning in the dark, and it all seems to be being brought to light right now.
Tony Hill writes: "As a lawyer — and by lawyer, I mean I serve tables at a restaurant — she's the least fraudulent thing in the White House nowadays. Love you, Candace. And prayers for your delivery." I agree. Justice for Karoline. I know you guys went home yesterday and listened to Mariah Carey — "Always Be My Kday." That's the new song. She's the best press secretary we've ever had, in my opinion. Gone too soon.
Blushing Chaos writes: "My apologies for the ex drama that ensued today. I was trying to give you some love and support and it blew up." Oh, you must have been the person who just wrote, "I like Candace," and then suddenly he couldn't deal with it. He just can't deal with his own failures because nobody likes him or listens to him, and he's never going to be relevant ever again. She continues: "I don't know how you deal with the constant attacks. My respect for you is now through the roof." Well, if he gets the courage to figure out how to drop the entire docs — all of them — which I am okay with, I will state this over and over again: no holdups on my end. You have my full permission to see every reason that I was fired. I think your respect for me will go beyond the roof, through the sky tops, to know what I lived through and how classy I kept it and how I just said, "Just leave me alone. Just leave me alone. Charlie's my friend. I'm not letting this go. You go do whatever you want to do with the rest of your life, chasing the high of the relevancy that you had for a very brief period before people learned who and what you actually are." That's all I ask for. Go be what you actually are.
And Kiwi responded, by the way, and said, "Thank you guys for all of the prayers." I guess in the chat you guys were saying that you will pray. My name is Kelly. Ah, there you go. Now you can pray for Kelly.